{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF","short_pith_number":"pith:5LOISOBW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"eadc893836e4bd111f55f0e555ed3c7956945dbaf0840fc2dea902431bdc234e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1806.02935","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Causal effects based on distributional distances","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Edward H. Kennedy, Jisu Kim, Kwangho Kim","submitted_at":"2018-06-08T01:26:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Comparing counterfactual distributions can provide more nuanced and valuable measures for causal effects, going beyond typical summary statistics such as averages. In this work, we consider characterizing causal effects via distributional distances, focusing on two kinds of target parameters. The first is the counterfactual outcome density. We propose a doubly robust-style estimator for the counterfactual density and study its rates of convergence and limiting distributions. We analyze asymptotic upper bounds on the $L_q$ and the integrated $L_q$ risks of the proposed estimator, and propose a "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1806.02935","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2018-06-08T01:26:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"165b604e2655f2d6f18ff1ddcb20f5601931cbabc31464d21989f0e1e1ef2263","abstract_canon_sha256":"595c0d38490d7bab1650e4b0d2ff2fe2f88c3be5bda1f4b02f9ad319f4ceeab9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727538Z","signature_b64":"Ce1dFGkkmi4cMJm0t/c0ve7Wa01W28XrHOLikWEOo8QPaFxxcr57mGwaFF+ZE7zeT2JNZ/sdCtb06C1S8WytAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"eadc893836e4bd111f55f0e555ed3c7956945dbaf0840fc2dea902431bdc234e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.726976Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.726976Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Causal effects based on distributional distances","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Edward H. Kennedy, Jisu Kim, Kwangho Kim","submitted_at":"2018-06-08T01:26:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Comparing counterfactual distributions can provide more nuanced and valuable measures for causal effects, going beyond typical summary statistics such as averages. In this work, we consider characterizing causal effects via distributional distances, focusing on two kinds of target parameters. The first is the counterfactual outcome density. We propose a doubly robust-style estimator for the counterfactual density and study its rates of convergence and limiting distributions. We analyze asymptotic upper bounds on the $L_q$ and the integrated $L_q$ risks of the proposed estimator, and propose a "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1806.02935","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1806.02935/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1806.02935","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1806.02935v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1806.02935","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5LOISOBW4S6R","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5LOISOBW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07665","citing_title":"Debiased Counterfactual Generation via Flow Matching from Observations","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5LOISOBW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5LOISOBW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1806.02935&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5LOISOBW4S6RCH2V6DSVL3J4PF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:29:59.727034+00:00"}