{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA","short_pith_number":"pith:5O6D3AK5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ebbc3d815dd6871fbb8537ebafd1d780204b8c228ebd18eefce93192c5501f09","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2010.06439","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Simulation-based inference methods for particle physics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Johann Brehmer, Kyle Cranmer","submitted_at":"2020-10-13T14:55:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Our predictions for particle physics processes are realized in a chain of complex simulators. They allow us to generate high-fidelity simulated data, but they are not well-suited for inference on the theory parameters with observed data. We explain why the likelihood function of high-dimensional LHC data cannot be explicitly evaluated, why this matters for data analysis, and reframe what the field has traditionally done to circumvent this problem. We then review new simulation-based inference methods that let us directly analyze high-dimensional data by combining machine learning techniques an"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2010.06439","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-10-13T14:55:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"0333b4e48b56470982bcefb34dd6aa393f8b35002eebf120bff907724554cfc0","abstract_canon_sha256":"c5491a2c5c0dd0b2e2e433de57a90c51c394c8811ef467b995c1a75e9fe7a341"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.254403Z","signature_b64":"9xD3dPgMNpHlM/cN3CIYGr6Z02hpAdmjqRjwdkPN1IDeyJNe3y/tZDSbUwgiWIj1eobGrA3oHv0l4xuETEIKDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ebbc3d815dd6871fbb8537ebafd1d780204b8c228ebd18eefce93192c5501f09","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253842Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253842Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Simulation-based inference methods for particle physics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Johann Brehmer, Kyle Cranmer","submitted_at":"2020-10-13T14:55:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Our predictions for particle physics processes are realized in a chain of complex simulators. They allow us to generate high-fidelity simulated data, but they are not well-suited for inference on the theory parameters with observed data. We explain why the likelihood function of high-dimensional LHC data cannot be explicitly evaluated, why this matters for data analysis, and reframe what the field has traditionally done to circumvent this problem. We then review new simulation-based inference methods that let us directly analyze high-dimensional data by combining machine learning techniques an"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2010.06439","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2010.06439/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2010.06439","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2010.06439v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2010.06439","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5O6D3AK522DR","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5O6D3AK522DR7O4F","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5O6D3AK5","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.08157","citing_title":"Bring the noise: exact inference from noisy simulations in collider physics","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5O6D3AK5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5O6D3AK5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2010.06439&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5O6D3AK522DR7O4FG7V27UOXQA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:48:13.253910+00:00"}