{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6","short_pith_number":"pith:5PEMU5KP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ebc8ca754fed1d2ae6909093a3306a47b999d168280e0f66b02d5e82d4788f7c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2110.14563","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The role of representational conventions in assessing the empirical significance of symmetries","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Henrique Gomes","submitted_at":"2021-10-27T16:33:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper explicates the direct empirical significance (DES) of symmetries in gauge theory, with comparisons to classical mechanics. Given a physical system composed of subsystems, such significance is to be awarded to physical differences of the composite system that arise from symmetries acting solely on its subsystems. So my overarching main question is: can DES be associated to the local gauge symmetries, acting solely on subsystems? In local gauge theories, any quantity with physical significance must be a gauge-invariant quantity. To attack the question of DES from this gauge-invariant "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2110.14563","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","submitted_at":"2021-10-27T16:33:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"f4029d474fba3a28ef1430f2d5349ca1c3f7e66db4131cb7e14c590e3892f2d3","abstract_canon_sha256":"ea2a27b8ee610d80ad0017dae5c78fdad48ed6541b2bc76b4b9c7dd85b9cf3c9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170880Z","signature_b64":"L3j/kzIhZrTktKQm8d9PkGH13TBpVHmYFM5RMfVK0ajy9y8mtysd5dlSEyDlGkhJmdXaaA5xMd+aCX9d90qNBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ebc8ca754fed1d2ae6909093a3306a47b999d168280e0f66b02d5e82d4788f7c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170479Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170479Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The role of representational conventions in assessing the empirical significance of symmetries","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"physics.hist-ph","authors_text":"Henrique Gomes","submitted_at":"2021-10-27T16:33:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper explicates the direct empirical significance (DES) of symmetries in gauge theory, with comparisons to classical mechanics. Given a physical system composed of subsystems, such significance is to be awarded to physical differences of the composite system that arise from symmetries acting solely on its subsystems. So my overarching main question is: can DES be associated to the local gauge symmetries, acting solely on subsystems? In local gauge theories, any quantity with physical significance must be a gauge-invariant quantity. To attack the question of DES from this gauge-invariant "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2110.14563","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2110.14563/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2110.14563","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2110.14563v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2110.14563","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5PEMU5KP5UOS","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5PEMU5KP","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.14548","citing_title":"Soft edges: the many links between soft and edge modes","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5PEMU5KP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5PEMU5KP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2110.14563&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5PEMU5KP5UOSVZUQSCJ2GMDKI6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:26:29.170534+00:00"}