{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC","short_pith_number":"pith:5S4GMYT4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ecb866627c0251147107e932b47887b0a773bc7b4a1a30389761f98de52a4c00","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1512.08552","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Rejection Odds and Rejection Ratios: A Proposal for Statistical Practice in Testing Hypotheses","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, M.J. Bayarri, Thomas M. Sellke","submitted_at":"2015-12-28T23:05:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Much of science is (rightly or wrongly) driven by hypothesis testing. Even in situations where the hypothesis testing paradigm is correct, the common practice of basing inferences solely on p-values has been under intense criticism for over 50 years. We propose, as an alternative, the use of the odds of a correct rejection of the null hypothesis to incorrect rejection. Both pre-experimental versions (involving the power and Type I error) and post-experimental versions (depending on the actual data) are considered. Implementations are provided that range from depending only on the p-value to co"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1512.08552","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2015-12-28T23:05:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"9ff27b3dccfb702310218ec50f5f65df5779913804c2bc55567d3e1ad33579df","abstract_canon_sha256":"72fa47e7950ec09288f4ae34eb69d617ac41a8216352a3e370ad3865ec5223fb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.438577Z","signature_b64":"++tDgmxL+ZGiZzWCbXw/Z7igSZSim3csyBl2fPWwHo+1/QLaMOV+ez/VHUkHjDRpPNt6Yo0iDopbEHbNiJ4BCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ecb866627c0251147107e932b47887b0a773bc7b4a1a30389761f98de52a4c00","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437779Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437779Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Rejection Odds and Rejection Ratios: A Proposal for Statistical Practice in Testing Hypotheses","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, M.J. Bayarri, Thomas M. Sellke","submitted_at":"2015-12-28T23:05:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Much of science is (rightly or wrongly) driven by hypothesis testing. Even in situations where the hypothesis testing paradigm is correct, the common practice of basing inferences solely on p-values has been under intense criticism for over 50 years. We propose, as an alternative, the use of the odds of a correct rejection of the null hypothesis to incorrect rejection. Both pre-experimental versions (involving the power and Type I error) and post-experimental versions (depending on the actual data) are considered. Implementations are provided that range from depending only on the p-value to co"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1512.08552","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1512.08552","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437903+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1512.08552v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437903+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1512.08552","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437903+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5S4GMYT4AJIR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:07.941421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:07.941421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5S4GMYT4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:07.941421+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5S4GMYT4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5S4GMYT4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1512.08552&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5S4GMYT4AJIRI4IH5EZLI6EHWC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437903+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:23:37.437903+00:00"}