{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M","short_pith_number":"pith:5T43XL5T","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ecf9bbafb3b74561eb44106fc6b2bcdb3844a58bef148a515766c1c7877252fc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.18393","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systems","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.NE","cs.RO","cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Guozhu Meng, Junjie Wang, Kairui Yang, Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou","submitted_at":"2024-02-28T15:13:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Autonomous Driving System (ADS) testing is crucial in ADS development, with the current primary focus being on safety. However, the evaluation of non-safety-critical performance, particularly the ADS's ability to make optimal decisions and produce optimal paths for autonomous vehicles (AVs), is also vital to ensure the intelligence and reduce risks of AVs. Currently, there is little work dedicated to assessing the robustness of ADSs' path-planning decisions (PPDs), i.e., whether an ADS can maintain the optimal PPD after an insignificant change in the environment. The key challenges include the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.18393","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-02-28T15:13:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.NE","cs.RO","cs.SE"],"title_canon_sha256":"62a5e64ea699bad9514030e5d8a5f96b98ba84a9f140c235be4a1ab0ac751533","abstract_canon_sha256":"26942bd025ec6e4754d183b14fb62ac05d39c2047a53aebc2173bada974d57d0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779627Z","signature_b64":"dAxL0yA7mKDQ36sI0VxITYc9GRuHk8Ko7ne5e6rUyPI5ZAH2pLiuoAv/CNiUaDGRPP60sycplPNbPqvgyG9KDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ecf9bbafb3b74561eb44106fc6b2bcdb3844a58bef148a515766c1c7877252fc","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779143Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779143Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Decictor: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Decision-Making in Autonomous Driving Systems","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.NE","cs.RO","cs.SE"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Guozhu Meng, Junjie Wang, Kairui Yang, Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou","submitted_at":"2024-02-28T15:13:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Autonomous Driving System (ADS) testing is crucial in ADS development, with the current primary focus being on safety. However, the evaluation of non-safety-critical performance, particularly the ADS's ability to make optimal decisions and produce optimal paths for autonomous vehicles (AVs), is also vital to ensure the intelligence and reduce risks of AVs. Currently, there is little work dedicated to assessing the robustness of ADSs' path-planning decisions (PPDs), i.e., whether an ADS can maintain the optimal PPD after an insignificant change in the environment. The key challenges include the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.18393","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.18393/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.18393","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.18393v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.18393","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5T43XL5TW5CW","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5T43XL5TW5CWD22E","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5T43XL5T","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29114","citing_title":"ReasonBreak: Probing Vulnerabilities in Reasoning-Enabled Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.16478","citing_title":"Constrained Co-evolutionary Metamorphic Differential Testing for Autonomous Systems with an Interpretability Approach","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18918","citing_title":"From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5T43XL5T"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5T43XL5T","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.18393&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5T43XL5TW5CWD22ECBX4NMV43M/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:06:27.779200+00:00"}