{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW","short_pith_number":"pith:5XTQ6RRO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ede70f462e78c303c0d749d97c3b7e0d9c2d8fd090f84e149a1ae0c42498a847","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2209.10898","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can the Higgs Still Account for the g-2 Anomaly?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Fayez Abu-Ajamieh, Sudhir K. Vempati","submitted_at":"2022-09-22T10:10:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We use an Effective Field Theory (EFT) approach to evaluate the viability of the Higgs to account for the $g-2$ anomaly. Although the SM contribution of the Higgs to the muon's magnetic dipole moment is negligible, using a \\textit{bottom-up} EFT, we show that given the current level of experimental limits on the Higgs sector, the Higgs can still yield a viable solution to the $g-2$ anomaly if its couplings to the rest of the SM particles are allowed to deviate from their SM predictions. Further, applying unitarity arguments, we show that such a solution would indicate a scale of New Physics (N"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2209.10898","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2022-09-22T10:10:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b80be8062a741e43bd8fcf9c1f2fc41d13d4cd43a3f7413d6c0595d106c28b77","abstract_canon_sha256":"6c0653e02d83cdc031a4fff4bd02a05e8acf20e48cc5295a32c6368885fec000"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.089080Z","signature_b64":"3KXwoU8XMR8pR3X+vyTroRpzwd+Q4ygzwU8J8ozaNGlfxM+brC+LjvotiLKDg2saDMsnX22np40wFiS4VALNBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ede70f462e78c303c0d749d97c3b7e0d9c2d8fd090f84e149a1ae0c42498a847","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088592Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088592Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can the Higgs Still Account for the g-2 Anomaly?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Fayez Abu-Ajamieh, Sudhir K. Vempati","submitted_at":"2022-09-22T10:10:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We use an Effective Field Theory (EFT) approach to evaluate the viability of the Higgs to account for the $g-2$ anomaly. Although the SM contribution of the Higgs to the muon's magnetic dipole moment is negligible, using a \\textit{bottom-up} EFT, we show that given the current level of experimental limits on the Higgs sector, the Higgs can still yield a viable solution to the $g-2$ anomaly if its couplings to the rest of the SM particles are allowed to deviate from their SM predictions. Further, applying unitarity arguments, we show that such a solution would indicate a scale of New Physics (N"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2209.10898","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2209.10898/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2209.10898","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2209.10898v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2209.10898","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5XTQ6RROPDBQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGX","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5XTQ6RRO","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.12208","citing_title":"Improved Bounds and Global Fit of Flavor-Violating Charged Lepton Yukawa Couplings post LHC","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5XTQ6RRO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5XTQ6RRO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2209.10898&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5XTQ6RROPDBQHQGXJHMXYO36BW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:55:38.088659+00:00"}