{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32","short_pith_number":"pith:5YIAZXRN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ee100cde2d0e50156b119e31666b77de8a45ec65f7b1c3eb31d9ad741d29fc0a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.13865","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Iryna Gurevych, Max Glockner, Yufang Hou","submitted_at":"2022-10-25T09:40:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Misinformation emerges in times of uncertainty when credible information is limited. This is challenging for NLP-based fact-checking as it relies on counter-evidence, which may not yet be available. Despite increasing interest in automatic fact-checking, it is still unclear if automated approaches can realistically refute harmful real-world misinformation. Here, we contrast and compare NLP fact-checking with how professional fact-checkers combat misinformation in the absence of counter-evidence. In our analysis, we show that, by design, existing NLP task definitions for fact-checking cannot re"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.13865","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-10-25T09:40:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"87128c5f3c844a878b6939eb6981dfe306896bd562e3441f53a00e64301807f1","abstract_canon_sha256":"1f594641498f9c60c4da88d7c570c3d7b080e0f7d3685e17f223b93adaa260f8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501337Z","signature_b64":"TdhNa72MxFrIeoPYuKBpH+v4Qrh7seIPHj83znCELn+rLMlW7YhzIziHma1x3669q9GFGErIbuCEZW3+4ZPNAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ee100cde2d0e50156b119e31666b77de8a45ec65f7b1c3eb31d9ad741d29fc0a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.500978Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.500978Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Iryna Gurevych, Max Glockner, Yufang Hou","submitted_at":"2022-10-25T09:40:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Misinformation emerges in times of uncertainty when credible information is limited. This is challenging for NLP-based fact-checking as it relies on counter-evidence, which may not yet be available. Despite increasing interest in automatic fact-checking, it is still unclear if automated approaches can realistically refute harmful real-world misinformation. Here, we contrast and compare NLP fact-checking with how professional fact-checkers combat misinformation in the absence of counter-evidence. In our analysis, we show that, by design, existing NLP task definitions for fact-checking cannot re"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.13865","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.13865/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.13865","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.13865v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.13865","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5YIAZXRNBZIB","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YR","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5YIAZXRN","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26663","citing_title":"Evidence Absence Is Not Evidence Insufficiency: Diagnosing NEI Construction Artifacts in Fact Verification","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5YIAZXRN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5YIAZXRN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.13865&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5YIAZXRNBZIBK2YRTYYWM23X32/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:10:23.501039+00:00"}