{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO","short_pith_number":"pith:5ZL5BEBA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ee57d09020d2bc6bde379b99f082608baf52e242b4d80d54fd75b122fb2bba16","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.14177","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Thinking Ahead: Prospection-Guided Retrieval of Memory with Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Prospection-guided retrieval uses imagined future steps to surface low-similarity memories that standard embedding search misses.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Chirag Shah, Harshita Chopra, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Ryen W. White, Suman Nath","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T22:57:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Long-horizon personalization requires dialogue assistants to retrieve user-specific facts from extended interaction histories. In practice, many relevant facts often have low semanticsimilarity to the query under dense retrieval. Standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and GraphRAG systems are still largely retrospective: they rely on embedding similarity to the query or on fixed graph traversals, so they often miss facts that matter for the user's needs but lie far from the query in embedding space. Inspired by prospection, the human ability to use imagined futures as cues for recall, w"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14177","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T22:57:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"98ac8736b1b1eb27395ad6dd8b7c2288dc3ca3f976015619d1bacd17111d6cab","abstract_canon_sha256":"62f61cc8c59a1b07970d8ac30e3c3db89577127e144fca86dc181c9ef7f16787"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289692Z","signature_b64":"CvFc5eMiIuK6hkjnbL7ZhDHJxi+Gr/j6PnKty8+mWMpB2NHHRcZAz3xwF2qS9VBtXdB3GUNSHN8grsCSQUTeCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ee57d09020d2bc6bde379b99f082608baf52e242b4d80d54fd75b122fb2bba16","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289183Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289183Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Thinking Ahead: Prospection-Guided Retrieval of Memory with Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Prospection-guided retrieval uses imagined future steps to surface low-similarity memories that standard embedding search misses.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Chirag Shah, Harshita Chopra, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Ryen W. White, Suman Nath","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T22:57:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Long-horizon personalization requires dialogue assistants to retrieve user-specific facts from extended interaction histories. In practice, many relevant facts often have low semanticsimilarity to the query under dense retrieval. Standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and GraphRAG systems are still largely retrospective: they rely on embedding similarity to the query or on fixed graph traversals, so they often miss facts that matter for the user's needs but lie far from the query in embedding space. Inspired by prospection, the human ability to use imagined futures as cues for recall, w"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"PGR-TOT substantially improves retrieval, including nearly 3x recall on MemoryQuest over the strongest baseline. In pairwise LLM-as-judge comparisons against baselines, PGR-generated responses are preferred on 89--98% of queries, with blinded human annotations on held-out subsets showing the same trend.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That LLM-generated prospection steps (ToT or linear chains) will consistently produce retrieval probes that surface genuinely relevant low-similarity memories without excessive noise or hallucinated irrelevancies, and that this holds across diverse user histories beyond the tested datasets.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"PGR expands user queries into plausible future steps via Tree-of-Thought or chains and uses them as retrieval probes, delivering nearly 3x recall gains on the new MemoryQuest benchmark for low-similarity memory retrieval.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Prospection-guided retrieval uses imagined future steps to surface low-similarity memories that standard embedding search misses.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"a26ba9b98a25b61c12b65e44d4f4d737f47b5df4d415fbd9de0963e274b0675e"},"source":{"id":"2605.14177","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"442f33a0-369c-4e9c-8bd2-9bc2819a09af","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T01:36:19.217203Z","strongest_claim":"PGR-TOT substantially improves retrieval, including nearly 3x recall on MemoryQuest over the strongest baseline. In pairwise LLM-as-judge comparisons against baselines, PGR-generated responses are preferred on 89--98% of queries, with blinded human annotations on held-out subsets showing the same trend.","one_line_summary":"PGR expands user queries into plausible future steps via Tree-of-Thought or chains and uses them as retrieval probes, delivering nearly 3x recall gains on the new MemoryQuest benchmark for low-similarity memory retrieval.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That LLM-generated prospection steps (ToT or linear chains) will consistently produce retrieval probes that surface genuinely relevant low-similarity memories without excessive noise or hallucinated irrelevancies, and that this holds across diverse user histories beyond the tested datasets.","pith_extraction_headline":"Prospection-guided retrieval uses imagined future steps to surface low-similarity memories that standard embedding search misses."},"references":{"count":22,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Daniel L. Schacter, Roland G. Benoit, and Karl K. Szpunar. Episodic future thinking: Mechanisms and functions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17:41–50, 2017","work_id":"38fe7a4b-2d68-44ad-83a0-f5667fe48edc","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2007,"title":"Wong, and Daniel L","work_id":"1a2659db-a0f3-41b3-b06b-eae5ee235d6b","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"Retrieval augmented language model pre-training","work_id":"e70217c9-14cb-49f9-9055-cc7eb6a1e705","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge- intensive nlp tasks.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:9459–9474, 2020","work_id":"02b21983-4a62-403a-bbbd-486acfd41f99","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization","work_id":"588618d7-fd41-4053-b34d-a981f8793039","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"2404.16130","is_internal_anchor":true}],"resolved_work":22,"snapshot_sha256":"771a9978a580dcdf5238e16f6eff18e1475afdf9f1f83a3dc7e066fd2f09b93e","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"ed85b13abe36bfe1f2a81bea0008c9394de275bf99f799d5d84d799a10c0d9f9"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14177","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289262+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14177v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289262+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14177","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289262+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5ZL5BEBA2K6G","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5ZL5BEBA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ZL5BEBA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ZL5BEBA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.14177&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZL5BEBA2K6GXXRXTOM7BATARO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289262+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:11.289262+00:00"}