{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3","short_pith_number":"pith:5ZPTYZ36","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ee5f3c677e2da17706e2007310cfcf56c65ffbb327d8cddcff2c22f0c3b35121","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.03793","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"SAMVAD: A Multi-Agent System for Simulating Judicial Deliberation Dynamics in India","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Omkaar Jayadev Shetty, Pooja Agarwal, Prathamesh Devadiga","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T01:04:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding the complexities of judicial deliberation is crucial for assessing the efficacy and fairness of a justice system. However, empirical studies of judicial panels are constrained by significant ethical and practical barriers. This paper introduces SAMVAD, an innovative Multi-Agent System (MAS) designed to simulate the deliberation process within the framework of the Indian justice system.\n  Our system comprises agents representing key judicial roles: a Judge, a Prosecution Counsel, a Defense Counsel, and multiple Adjudicators (simulating a judicial bench), all powered by large langu"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.03793","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T01:04:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"12e5c961a4488286f2d5e26e769c6d860a49a214c3f1951d6931943fa0123a30","abstract_canon_sha256":"02870861b4d819c19139e33a5c275569e4bd3cd804acdcf105d0d46b49eaea23"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.161238Z","signature_b64":"BhLqmdXT375m1jWaeIQkKt1WD/Bqg6yd566MQmvpTMHYFVELLESv0Yj2IrKZGdfI8NCS9fqobtbnRwTRyZL+Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ee5f3c677e2da17706e2007310cfcf56c65ffbb327d8cddcff2c22f0c3b35121","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160745Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160745Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"SAMVAD: A Multi-Agent System for Simulating Judicial Deliberation Dynamics in India","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Omkaar Jayadev Shetty, Pooja Agarwal, Prathamesh Devadiga","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T01:04:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding the complexities of judicial deliberation is crucial for assessing the efficacy and fairness of a justice system. However, empirical studies of judicial panels are constrained by significant ethical and practical barriers. This paper introduces SAMVAD, an innovative Multi-Agent System (MAS) designed to simulate the deliberation process within the framework of the Indian justice system.\n  Our system comprises agents representing key judicial roles: a Judge, a Prosecution Counsel, a Defense Counsel, and multiple Adjudicators (simulating a judicial bench), all powered by large langu"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.03793","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.03793/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.03793","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.03793v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.03793","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"5ZPTYZ36FWQX","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXC","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"5ZPTYZ36","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30906","citing_title":"Investigating Multi-Agent Deliberation in Law","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ZPTYZ36"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/5ZPTYZ36","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.03793&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/5ZPTYZ36FWQXOBXCABZRBT6PK3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:04:46.160805+00:00"}