{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT","short_pith_number":"pith:62QEU4V6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f6a04a72be511827497d9ccd82012f0cf351c6fa2a278bd28bc73d6e03c1a9bc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.18239","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Unveiling and Causalizing CoT: A Causal Pespective","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hao Li, Jiarun Fu, Lizhong Ding, Pengqi Li, Qiuning Wei, Xu Chen","submitted_at":"2025-02-25T14:20:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Although Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has achieved remarkable success in enhancing the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), the mechanism of CoT remains a ``black box''. Even if the correct answers can frequently be obtained, existing CoTs struggle to make the reasoning understandable to human. In this paper, we unveil and causalize CoT from a causal perspective to ensure both correctness and understandability of all reasoning steps (to the best of our knowledge, the first such). We model causality of CoT via structural causal models (SCM) to unveil the reasoning mechanism of CoT. To m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.18239","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-02-25T14:20:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bb7df34a68a1ab28fa80e305446d1f3481a3b3fdc99d942be7f19d38e0db6fbb","abstract_canon_sha256":"4f08be6564d482066a8d29982f18de1fffa431a46ea5b58dcc53c55afb20c023"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.939164Z","signature_b64":"N5jrdbmTnBMDuvQsrEawPSAAyHwa7AMlwFsO0IUUZAErudpO41AH7x9+h5Hi5agk3Zeuz1uh88B2uUw4J3qPBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f6a04a72be511827497d9ccd82012f0cf351c6fa2a278bd28bc73d6e03c1a9bc","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938743Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938743Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Unveiling and Causalizing CoT: A Causal Pespective","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Hao Li, Jiarun Fu, Lizhong Ding, Pengqi Li, Qiuning Wei, Xu Chen","submitted_at":"2025-02-25T14:20:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Although Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has achieved remarkable success in enhancing the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), the mechanism of CoT remains a ``black box''. Even if the correct answers can frequently be obtained, existing CoTs struggle to make the reasoning understandable to human. In this paper, we unveil and causalize CoT from a causal perspective to ensure both correctness and understandability of all reasoning steps (to the best of our knowledge, the first such). We model causality of CoT via structural causal models (SCM) to unveil the reasoning mechanism of CoT. To m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.18239","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.18239/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.18239","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.18239v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.18239","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"62QEU4V6KEMC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"62QEU4V6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05966","citing_title":"Causal Scaffolding for Physical Reasoning: A Benchmark for Causally-Informed Physical World Understanding in VLMs","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.09567","citing_title":"Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models","ref_index":190,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10693","citing_title":"FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/62QEU4V6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/62QEU4V6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.18239&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/62QEU4V6KEMCOSL5TTGYEAJPBT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:50.938801+00:00"}