{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U","short_pith_number":"pith:65QU7C43","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f7614f8b9bf0f1bb4a1e98542a664be52c07064b88dcf3ec2515ad612baa978d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.13640","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Baosong Yang, Derek F. Wong, Pei Zhang, Rui Wang, Yiming Wang","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T15:09:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"LLM self-evaluation relies on the LLM's own ability to estimate response correctness, which can greatly improve its deployment reliability. In this research track, we propose the Chain-of-Embedding (CoE) in the latent space to enable LLMs to perform output-free self-evaluation. CoE consists of all progressive hidden states produced during the inference time, which can be treated as the latent thinking path of LLMs. We find that when LLMs respond correctly and incorrectly, their CoE features differ, these discrepancies assist us in estimating LLM response correctness. Experiments in four divers"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.13640","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T15:09:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"5c65e827faa925625683e03fea9900a76a1e8eeb676df55e3ed5cc691a099a06","abstract_canon_sha256":"4b2d5f69105d996c11f39b05710911aebff98a06b3c7285238a1c095788998d7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014856Z","signature_b64":"QIwVFDFUFbfPNuEGNL/X+3x01mkRf6mP9j7ediPVGByB65eD2zxYVULWq61lK4TEcwLsaSR2HRobwnNg+SWsCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f7614f8b9bf0f1bb4a1e98542a664be52c07064b88dcf3ec2515ad612baa978d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.013917Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.013917Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Baosong Yang, Derek F. Wong, Pei Zhang, Rui Wang, Yiming Wang","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T15:09:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"LLM self-evaluation relies on the LLM's own ability to estimate response correctness, which can greatly improve its deployment reliability. In this research track, we propose the Chain-of-Embedding (CoE) in the latent space to enable LLMs to perform output-free self-evaluation. CoE consists of all progressive hidden states produced during the inference time, which can be treated as the latent thinking path of LLMs. We find that when LLMs respond correctly and incorrectly, their CoE features differ, these discrepancies assist us in estimating LLM response correctness. Experiments in four divers"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.13640","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.13640/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.13640","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.13640v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.13640","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"65QU7C436DY3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"65QU7C436DY3WSQ6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"65QU7C43","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08035","citing_title":"DyCo-RL: Dynamic Cross-Modal Coordination for Visual Reasoning","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.11101","citing_title":"Consensus Entropy: Harnessing Multi-VLM Agreement for Self-Verifying and Self-Improving OCR","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17877","citing_title":"PAIR: Prefix-Aware Internal Reward Model for Multi-Turn Agent Optimization","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.21619","citing_title":"On the Overscaling Curse of Parallel Thinking: System Efficacy Contradicts Sample Efficiency","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15741","citing_title":"Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18464","citing_title":"Semantic Step Prediction: Multi-Step Latent Forecasting in LLM Reasoning Trajectories via Step Sampling","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U","json":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/65QU7C43"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/65QU7C43","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.13640&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/65QU7C436DY3WSQ6TBKCUZSL4U/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:25.014025+00:00"}