{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP","short_pith_number":"pith:65XY5E7H","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f76f8e93e7753ab1505b81ae42127e53c5e1d70ef649008f5f194777a88218e6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1707.08749","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Aviad Heifetz (The Open University of Israel, Chennai, Groningen, Harmen de Weerd (University of Groningen, India), Israe), Raanana, Rineke Verbrugge (University of Groningen, Sujata Ghosh (Indian Statistical Institute, the Netherlands)","submitted_at":"2017-07-27T07:50:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"In an earlier experiment, participants played a perfect information game against a computer, which was programmed to deviate often from its backward induction strategy right at the beginning of the game. Participants knew that in each game, the computer was nevertheless optimizing against some belief about the participant's future strategy. In the aggregate, it appeared that participants applied forward induction. However, cardinal effects seemed to play a role as well: a number of participants might have been trying to maximize expected utility.\n  In order to find out how people really reason"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1707.08749","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2017-07-27T07:50:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6ad7012fe9bf036ee6f94a6a561238ebafca147fe05e9f34b84c1eb3e0179bb5","abstract_canon_sha256":"07ba77510acb6d295bb93c8dcf204c32eb277529fdaa0d3b1dcd15dfdbc8b834"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664688Z","signature_b64":"XhnlBZPTutn5dLoyUK6rXC0zqcxEJMXOcNItD1mtW3rhPOc1TpLjmnm4mFBADXxcVn1eoGdIIz27eUi8nvucBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f76f8e93e7753ab1505b81ae42127e53c5e1d70ef649008f5f194777a88218e6","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664110Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664110Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Aviad Heifetz (The Open University of Israel, Chennai, Groningen, Harmen de Weerd (University of Groningen, India), Israe), Raanana, Rineke Verbrugge (University of Groningen, Sujata Ghosh (Indian Statistical Institute, the Netherlands)","submitted_at":"2017-07-27T07:50:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"In an earlier experiment, participants played a perfect information game against a computer, which was programmed to deviate often from its backward induction strategy right at the beginning of the game. Participants knew that in each game, the computer was nevertheless optimizing against some belief about the participant's future strategy. In the aggregate, it appeared that participants applied forward induction. However, cardinal effects seemed to play a role as well: a number of participants might have been trying to maximize expected utility.\n  In order to find out how people really reason"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1707.08749","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1707.08749","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1707.08749v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.08749","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"65XY5E7HOU5L","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:03.183658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:03.183658+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"65XY5E7H","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:03.183658+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/65XY5E7H"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/65XY5E7H","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1707.08749&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/65XY5E7HOU5LCUC3QGXEEET6KP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664203+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:39:19.664203+00:00"}