{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T","short_pith_number":"pith:6AAIYRFG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f0008c44a620e2e43aacdf3dc301e9fcf3e06487b5060393c1583d1f5ae3dfd1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.09172","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Unlocking the Power of LLM Uncertainty for Active In-Context Example Selection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Junzhao Zhang, Yunfang Wu, Yutong Yang, Zichen Wu","submitted_at":"2024-08-17T11:33:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of downstream tasks. However, it is challenging for users to discern whether the responses of LLM are generated with certainty or are fabricated to meet user expectations. In this paper, we introduce Uncertainty Tripartite Testing Paradigm (Unc-TTP), a novel method for classifying LLM uncertainty by leveraging output inconsistency. Specifically, Unc-TTP performs three rounds of sampling under varying label injection interference, enumerating all possible outcomes, and uses the degree of output inconsistency as t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.09172","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-08-17T11:33:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"287e36dc0ac730aa2499bccb7fb750b183efe31d14e28f035b62b06611bb2fcb","abstract_canon_sha256":"e573e1bc4338897f66aac52cbd1c1bd6cb8ee3753d8875c183824b2a782bb35d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.295115Z","signature_b64":"mJmMozxg9R+wDlvKWKaXbxLL1zMrae++5zFd0kVXLTNCxsTVQQeVd6F8GZfLw3h4X50JOZhogpUE/xgbL3LzCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f0008c44a620e2e43aacdf3dc301e9fcf3e06487b5060393c1583d1f5ae3dfd1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294731Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294731Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Unlocking the Power of LLM Uncertainty for Active In-Context Example Selection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Junzhao Zhang, Yunfang Wu, Yutong Yang, Zichen Wu","submitted_at":"2024-08-17T11:33:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of downstream tasks. However, it is challenging for users to discern whether the responses of LLM are generated with certainty or are fabricated to meet user expectations. In this paper, we introduce Uncertainty Tripartite Testing Paradigm (Unc-TTP), a novel method for classifying LLM uncertainty by leveraging output inconsistency. Specifically, Unc-TTP performs three rounds of sampling under varying label injection interference, enumerating all possible outcomes, and uses the degree of output inconsistency as t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.09172","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.09172/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.09172","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.09172v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.09172","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6AAIYRFGEDRO","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6AAIYRFG","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12701","citing_title":"Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions","ref_index":213,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09852","citing_title":"Fairness of Explanations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Unifying Framework, Axioms, and Future Direction toward Responsible AI","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05777","citing_title":"Estimating the Black-box LLM Uncertainty with Distribution-Aligned Adversarial Distillation","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19488","citing_title":"CoDA: Towards Effective Cross-domain Knowledge Transfer via CoT-guided Domain Adaptation","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6AAIYRFG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6AAIYRFG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.09172&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6AAIYRFGEDROIOVM3464GAPJ7T/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:59:51.294780+00:00"}