{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR","short_pith_number":"pith:6AC6RCUI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f005e88a884043bd98ae3fa41d924e5c60a72cd85c4ab639ddd568ea00175e98","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.08944","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Optimizing Sequential Multi-Step Tasks with Parallel LLM Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Adam Fourney, Enhao Zhang, Erkang Zhu, Gagan Bansal, Hussein Mozannar, Jack Gerrits","submitted_at":"2025-07-11T18:09:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems have demonstrated remarkable promise for tackling complex tasks by breaking them down into subtasks that are iteratively planned, executed, observed, and refined. Despite their effectiveness, these systems often incur high latency because real-world problems frequently demand multiple iterative cycles of reasoning steps. To address this challenge, we propose M1-Parallel, a framework that concurrently runs multiple multi-agent teams in parallel to uncover distinct solution paths. By leveraging an event-driven communication model with asynchro"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.08944","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2025-07-11T18:09:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"ab6bf959a415558857517a35ebcdc5c266602cc11ff3290cf8a409d19f82f316","abstract_canon_sha256":"adb6196f568fc6c3c7535d36b70a3fb168c5915d96a1ba440f7455be09186dc5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882606Z","signature_b64":"5bnKRBD5C73qBWGro+WSRHgQFBZkWqF+SsRZZ58/WEfWhLSFqbltivWFUNbbE5ZPgfFRuPiYSX3IcPn58QNvBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f005e88a884043bd98ae3fa41d924e5c60a72cd85c4ab639ddd568ea00175e98","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882170Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882170Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Optimizing Sequential Multi-Step Tasks with Parallel LLM Agents","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Adam Fourney, Enhao Zhang, Erkang Zhu, Gagan Bansal, Hussein Mozannar, Jack Gerrits","submitted_at":"2025-07-11T18:09:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems have demonstrated remarkable promise for tackling complex tasks by breaking them down into subtasks that are iteratively planned, executed, observed, and refined. Despite their effectiveness, these systems often incur high latency because real-world problems frequently demand multiple iterative cycles of reasoning steps. To address this challenge, we propose M1-Parallel, a framework that concurrently runs multiple multi-agent teams in parallel to uncover distinct solution paths. By leveraging an event-driven communication model with asynchro"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.08944","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.08944/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.08944","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.08944v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.08944","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6AC6RCUIIBB3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6AC6RCUIIBB33GFO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6AC6RCUI","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29612","citing_title":"CONCAT: Consensus- and Confidence-Driven Ad Hoc Teaming for Efficient LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14892","citing_title":"Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":275,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.05307","citing_title":"When Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency inMulti-Step Agentic AI Tasks","ref_index":100,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14892","citing_title":"Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":274,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6AC6RCUI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6AC6RCUI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.08944&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6AC6RCUIIBB33GFOH6SB3ESOLR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:00.882226+00:00"}