{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ","short_pith_number":"pith:6LJLEDHP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f2d2b20cefb5c1854e7a76c7af10792c00f8ac9077e9ca3c57d0da2f0903d060","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.16238","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Brain-Model Evaluations Need the NeuroAI Turing Test","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG","cs.NE"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.NC","authors_text":"Aran Nayebi, Jenelle Feather, Meenakshi Khosla, N. Apurva Ratan Murty","submitted_at":"2025-02-22T14:16:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"What makes an artificial system a good model of intelligence? The classical test proposed by Alan Turing focuses on behavior, requiring that an artificial agent's behavior be indistinguishable from that of a human. While behavioral similarity provides a strong starting point, two systems with very different internal representations can produce the same outputs. Thus, in modeling biological intelligence, the field of NeuroAI often aims to go beyond behavioral similarity and achieve representational convergence between a model's activations and the measured activity of a biological system. This "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.16238","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-bio.NC","submitted_at":"2025-02-22T14:16:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG","cs.NE"],"title_canon_sha256":"f63acd88ee9e49e0677d2e69cc097b0e78b78a35ddebb79f00bc981c474b4f18","abstract_canon_sha256":"f9477a2692afcdc49503f2a648ce55565d6efe272e86d5b62a1db92971bd9940"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176770Z","signature_b64":"ngneaPPQgSfIlZYzDgaEIdvIlNgpuA5bA/EgmdJp6DdwpPexVF/KjAqyFnuSan9FflHJKpwmZ4pSib+VH2FYDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f2d2b20cefb5c1854e7a76c7af10792c00f8ac9077e9ca3c57d0da2f0903d060","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176260Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176260Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Brain-Model Evaluations Need the NeuroAI Turing Test","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG","cs.NE"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.NC","authors_text":"Aran Nayebi, Jenelle Feather, Meenakshi Khosla, N. Apurva Ratan Murty","submitted_at":"2025-02-22T14:16:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"What makes an artificial system a good model of intelligence? The classical test proposed by Alan Turing focuses on behavior, requiring that an artificial agent's behavior be indistinguishable from that of a human. While behavioral similarity provides a strong starting point, two systems with very different internal representations can produce the same outputs. Thus, in modeling biological intelligence, the field of NeuroAI often aims to go beyond behavioral similarity and achieve representational convergence between a model's activations and the measured activity of a biological system. This "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.16238","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.16238/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.16238","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.16238v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.16238","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6LJLEDHPWXAY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6LJLEDHP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26880","citing_title":"Heterogeneous Neural Predictivity from Language Models During Naturalistic Comprehension","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20127","citing_title":"Beyond Prediction Accuracy: Target-Space Recovery Profiles for Evaluating Model-Brain Alignment","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14025","citing_title":"Do Language Models Align with Brains? Prediction Scores Are Not Enough","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21780","citing_title":"Only Brains Align with Brains: Cross-Region Alignment Patterns Expose Limits of Normative Models","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05907","citing_title":"Decoding Alignment without Encoding Alignment: A critique of similarity analysis in neuroscience","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6LJLEDHP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6LJLEDHP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.16238&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6LJLEDHPWXAYKTT2O3D26EDZFQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:20:20.176321+00:00"}