{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2","short_pith_number":"pith:6LZI6IQX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f2f28f2217c86896c6d84315467f5f5688684ba979822a29ea2f6e47af307ebc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.15142","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Creating treatment and component hierarchies in component network meta-analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"A workflow identifies uniquely estimable relative effects to build valid treatment hierarchies in component network meta-analysis.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Audrey B\\'eliveau, Augustine Wigle, Lifeng Lin","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:46:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Component network meta-analysis (CNMA) is a statistical methodology that enables estimation of relative effects for multi-component treatments, such as combinations of antidepressants, and individual components, such as single antidepressants, by synthesizing data from multiple studies. A commonly desired output of a systematic review and meta-analysis is a hierarchy of the treatments in terms of a certain performance metric. Methods have been established for standard network meta-analysis (NMA), but have not yet been extended to CNMA. In particular, CNMA presents unique challenges because the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15142","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:46:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"edc2fa7493d147857d97772689664625643568392687fa7b0e283170a099c544","abstract_canon_sha256":"65719140e2f2ef6f6a31cec15547ccd99cf53fe234cd401854dad1ad4d9f322c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.2","canonical_sha256":"f2f28f2217c86896c6d84315467f5f5688684ba979822a29ea2f6e47af307ebc","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T21:57:18.877080Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T21:40:25.556870Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Creating treatment and component hierarchies in component network meta-analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"A workflow identifies uniquely estimable relative effects to build valid treatment hierarchies in component network meta-analysis.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Audrey B\\'eliveau, Augustine Wigle, Lifeng Lin","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:46:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Component network meta-analysis (CNMA) is a statistical methodology that enables estimation of relative effects for multi-component treatments, such as combinations of antidepressants, and individual components, such as single antidepressants, by synthesizing data from multiple studies. A commonly desired output of a systematic review and meta-analysis is a hierarchy of the treatments in terms of a certain performance metric. Methods have been established for standard network meta-analysis (NMA), but have not yet been extended to CNMA. In particular, CNMA presents unique challenges because the"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We present a step-by-step workflow for answering treatment hierarchy questions in both frequentist and Bayesian CNMA, including explicitly identifying the uniquely estimable relative effects.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That identifying uniquely estimable relative effects is always feasible from the network structure and sufficient to construct valid non-misleading hierarchies without further assumptions on connectivity or data.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A workflow for treatment hierarchies in CNMA that identifies uniquely estimable relative effects in frequentist and Bayesian settings.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"A workflow identifies uniquely estimable relative effects to build valid treatment hierarchies in component network meta-analysis.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"954117978b878892b0d93a6b13e003a83da8924983e71d34914052dd502b7398"},"source":{"id":"2605.15142","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"d742324b-ec6e-4ac5-b4d6-8a601a63b964","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T03:03:54.088339Z","strongest_claim":"We present a step-by-step workflow for answering treatment hierarchy questions in both frequentist and Bayesian CNMA, including explicitly identifying the uniquely estimable relative effects.","one_line_summary":"A workflow for treatment hierarchies in CNMA that identifies uniquely estimable relative effects in frequentist and Bayesian settings.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That identifying uniquely estimable relative effects is always feasible from the network structure and sufficient to construct valid non-misleading hierarchies without further assumptions on connectivity or data.","pith_extraction_headline":"A workflow identifies uniquely estimable relative effects to build valid treatment hierarchies in component network meta-analysis."},"references":{"count":133,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"Ades, A. E. and Davies, Annabel L. and Phillippo, David M. and Pedder, Hugo and Thom, Howard and Downing, Beatrice and Caldwell, Deborah M. and Welton, Nicky J. , year = 2025, journal =. Treatment Rec","work_id":"c28c2542-eea2-465b-94d9-93649e3ba019","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"Ades, A. E. and Welton, Nicky J. and Dias, Sofia and Phillippo, David M. and Caldwell, Deborah M. , year = 2024, journal =. Twenty Years of Network Meta-Analysis:","work_id":"f3c82b72-c6f2-4df7-a6d7-4224cabe582b","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Electronic Journal of Statistics , volume =","work_id":"ce56d05d-ad0f-4c46-8fa1-e8e5764db821","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Al Mohamad, Diaa and Goeman, Jelle J. and. Simultaneous. Biometrics , volume =","work_id":"63418ad8-f716-44b0-abcb-726d4a394af4","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"and Premji, Zahra A","work_id":"6d4a8a5a-602a-4272-9638-bcb64c19ceb3","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":133,"snapshot_sha256":"4e02e420ace1b6ba42c654d06705fc766a9d44dd0c4ac86cdcdf5488febb20e7","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15142","created_at":"2026-05-17T21:18:33.166516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15142v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T21:18:33.166516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6LZI6IQXZBUJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6LZI6IQX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6LZI6IQX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6LZI6IQX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.15142&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6LZI6IQXZBUJNRWYIMKUM727K2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T21:18:33.166516+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T21:57:18.877181+00:00"}