{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS","short_pith_number":"pith:6OG44WNQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f38dce59b0ce0f2ff25c1ed78e9c719caa32c792171071b3356902f0945bb3ef","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1405.5827","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Voting with Coarse Beliefs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Edward Lui, Rafael Pass, Samantha Leung","submitted_at":"2014-05-22T17:05:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"The classic Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem says that every strategy-proof voting rule with at least three possible candidates must be dictatorial. Similar impossibility results hold even if we consider a weaker notion of strategy-proofness where voters believe that the other voters' preferences are i.i.d.~(independent and identically distributed). In this paper, we take a bounded-rationality approach to this problem and consider a setting where voters have \"coarse\" beliefs (a notion that has gained popularity in the behavioral economics literature). In particular, we construct good voting rules"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1405.5827","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2014-05-22T17:05:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c8aca3cc5a65f26153e91c2cf7221514df92cfee6703bf68ba268461bf00152c","abstract_canon_sha256":"7db0ab90321a89f8c7ba78f61a6e92592cf73b0b9aa87451fe28caea220fb738"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.003467Z","signature_b64":"dxyRfy13KVi+2GjJ8uekgSszSIXt/zLiQd97b6E0AO7FLqWiCQ9Jti3vookjbpc+dgV9P1894ulwo2vmjo+CAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f38dce59b0ce0f2ff25c1ed78e9c719caa32c792171071b3356902f0945bb3ef","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002923Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002923Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Voting with Coarse Beliefs","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Edward Lui, Rafael Pass, Samantha Leung","submitted_at":"2014-05-22T17:05:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"The classic Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem says that every strategy-proof voting rule with at least three possible candidates must be dictatorial. Similar impossibility results hold even if we consider a weaker notion of strategy-proofness where voters believe that the other voters' preferences are i.i.d.~(independent and identically distributed). In this paper, we take a bounded-rationality approach to this problem and consider a setting where voters have \"coarse\" beliefs (a notion that has gained popularity in the behavioral economics literature). In particular, we construct good voting rules"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1405.5827","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1405.5827","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1405.5827v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1405.5827","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002998+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6OG44WNQZYHS","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:16.859392+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6OG44WNQZYHS74S4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:16.859392+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6OG44WNQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:16.859392+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6OG44WNQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6OG44WNQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1405.5827&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6OG44WNQZYHS74S4D3LY5HDRTS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002998+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:29:55.002998+00:00"}