{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K","short_pith_number":"pith:6R2HMPGP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f474763ccf04e557bfb1ab6bbdb0baeaa0e5f35c821b21db2491363574037d4a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.17127","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Er-Te Zheng, Hui-Zhen Fu, Mike Thelwall, Zhichao Fang","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T02:04:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Scientific retractions reflect issues within the scientific record, arising from human error or misconduct. Although gender differences in retraction rates have been previously observed in various contexts, no comprehensive study has explored this issue across all fields of science. This study examines gender disparities in scientific misconduct or errors, specifically focusing on differences in retraction rates between male and female first authors in relation to their research productivity. Using a dataset comprising 11,622 retracted articles and 19,475,437 non-retracted articles from the We"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.17127","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T02:04:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6bdc1dd6112aeccd1d2994a4475fba98dea3143d6e4858790abeac45e50c396a","abstract_canon_sha256":"fbbd168bc92e9e372040004977635e90fa333f59bcf7fd68b431114c6b241216"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744774Z","signature_b64":"UlpaGSVVE2c2nuUudH5051rabpL1Mt/MG4/WxVbUD5mZeG+cc89WknR/i/76IPpygJQOUgFBQirW6S8t1AehAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f474763ccf04e557bfb1ab6bbdb0baeaa0e5f35c821b21db2491363574037d4a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744384Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744384Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Er-Te Zheng, Hui-Zhen Fu, Mike Thelwall, Zhichao Fang","submitted_at":"2025-07-23T02:04:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Scientific retractions reflect issues within the scientific record, arising from human error or misconduct. Although gender differences in retraction rates have been previously observed in various contexts, no comprehensive study has explored this issue across all fields of science. This study examines gender disparities in scientific misconduct or errors, specifically focusing on differences in retraction rates between male and female first authors in relation to their research productivity. Using a dataset comprising 11,622 retracted articles and 19,475,437 non-retracted articles from the We"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.17127","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.17127/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.17127","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.17127v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.17127","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6R2HMPGPATSV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6R2HMPGPATSVPP5R","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6R2HMPGP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6R2HMPGP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6R2HMPGP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.17127&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6R2HMPGPATSVPP5RVNV33MF25K/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:42:01.744442+00:00"}