{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA","short_pith_number":"pith:6UJ4OZBZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f513c7643945f20ba8466a9e9bfdcac01f43b1352856769216428143c7bd9ebf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.10845","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Learning Preferences from Conjoint Data: A Structural Deep Learning Approach","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"Embedding a deep neural network inside a random utility logit model recovers flexible preference heterogeneity from conjoint data.","cross_cats":["econ.EM"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Avidit Acharya, Jens Hainmueller, Yiqing Xu","submitted_at":"2026-04-12T22:35:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conjoint experiments randomize multidimensional profiles, offering a powerful design for recovering structural preference parameters -- including marginal rates of substitution, willingness to pay, and the distribution of preferences across a population. Yet the dominant approach in political science has focused on nonparametric causal estimands that do not leverage this potential. We propose a structural approach that embeds a deep neural network within a random utility logit model, allowing preference parameters to vary as a fully flexible function of respondent characteristics. The neural n"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.10845","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-04-12T22:35:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.EM"],"title_canon_sha256":"dcd6d07b75ca7a7e0d8a08f39ca341d8c7ef3854813863a1e3d69e6d6199ddad","abstract_canon_sha256":"aafd88124a2513206e8c5d6f7987e47577865866c671acf928aa5520f57a0a2e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.261270Z","signature_b64":"JyKZKhooucRh9w0nmP3hWC7VCfem3EW4WUjm+LF56SV1QaDj4TV/RR8pg9tXV+KsWMiaDUz0A1jwljjNNlRRDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f513c7643945f20ba8466a9e9bfdcac01f43b1352856769216428143c7bd9ebf","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260459Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260459Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Learning Preferences from Conjoint Data: A Structural Deep Learning Approach","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"Embedding a deep neural network inside a random utility logit model recovers flexible preference heterogeneity from conjoint data.","cross_cats":["econ.EM"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Avidit Acharya, Jens Hainmueller, Yiqing Xu","submitted_at":"2026-04-12T22:35:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conjoint experiments randomize multidimensional profiles, offering a powerful design for recovering structural preference parameters -- including marginal rates of substitution, willingness to pay, and the distribution of preferences across a population. Yet the dominant approach in political science has focused on nonparametric causal estimands that do not leverage this potential. We propose a structural approach that embeds a deep neural network within a random utility logit model, allowing preference parameters to vary as a fully flexible function of respondent characteristics. The neural n"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We propose a structural approach that embeds a deep neural network within a random utility logit model, allowing preference parameters to vary as a fully flexible function of respondent characteristics. [...] We apply our method to three prominent conjoint studies and find rich preference heterogeneity masked by reduced-form averages: a near-zero gender effect coexists with 83% preferring female candidates, opposition to undemocratic behavior is near-universal but varies sharply in intensity, and progressive tax preferences cut across every partisan subgroup.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The assumption that the random utility logit model with neural network-embedded parameters accurately represents the choice process, and that double/debiased machine learning successfully debiases the estimates despite the high flexibility of the neural network.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A structural deep learning approach for conjoint data reveals rich preference heterogeneity masked by reduced-form averages in three studies.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Embedding a deep neural network inside a random utility logit model recovers flexible preference heterogeneity from conjoint data.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"ef365248b953a0a6ee9f458b458ce19c4cb1dc8880704e8e2857c394e7ed283d"},"source":{"id":"2604.10845","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"1a7ab9ad-4288-49a2-91c0-bd81421b4940","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T15:05:00.691263Z","strongest_claim":"We propose a structural approach that embeds a deep neural network within a random utility logit model, allowing preference parameters to vary as a fully flexible function of respondent characteristics. [...] We apply our method to three prominent conjoint studies and find rich preference heterogeneity masked by reduced-form averages: a near-zero gender effect coexists with 83% preferring female candidates, opposition to undemocratic behavior is near-universal but varies sharply in intensity, and progressive tax preferences cut across every partisan subgroup.","one_line_summary":"A structural deep learning approach for conjoint data reveals rich preference heterogeneity masked by reduced-form averages in three studies.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The assumption that the random utility logit model with neural network-embedded parameters accurately represents the choice process, and that double/debiased machine learning successfully debiases the estimates despite the high flexibility of the neural network.","pith_extraction_headline":"Embedding a deep neural network inside a random utility logit model recovers flexible preference heterogeneity from conjoint data."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.10845/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.10845","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.10845v2","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.10845","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6UJ4OZBZIXZA","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCG","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6UJ4OZBZ","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15064","citing_title":"Ranked-choice conjoint experiments","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6UJ4OZBZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6UJ4OZBZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.10845&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6UJ4OZBZIXZAXKCGNKPJX7OKYA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.260573+00:00"}