{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2024:6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH","short_pith_number":"pith:6V4II2NK","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.01459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-12-02T12:51:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"507c64efbd2e4fda537b64f97609f729869152764d6ed3c5176c6d385f1aa122","abstract_canon_sha256":"06b3d3eb26e4ba7f6f3af82db6813285060b4af180244317468fc78a7ae619de"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"f5788469aaecddea0837d1378ab9c0b1d08c28f1e0c697d28928f479a073f1b9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.01459","version":2},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.01459","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.01459v2","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.01459","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6V4II2NK5TO6","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6V4II2NK","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2024:6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.01459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-12-02T12:51:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"507c64efbd2e4fda537b64f97609f729869152764d6ed3c5176c6d385f1aa122","abstract_canon_sha256":"06b3d3eb26e4ba7f6f3af82db6813285060b4af180244317468fc78a7ae619de"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"f5788469aaecddea0837d1378ab9c0b1d08c28f1e0c697d28928f479a073f1b9","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10.375851Z","signature_b64":"wcMty2E6Ny0HMuG5BDZ1x69VM0dsGlQ7Pjp3D82ajaS/J8PB2yib5ZC9+P6BtP3Lji7w5k+8DONSwOPMFJZdAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f5788469aaecddea0837d1378ab9c0b1d08c28f1e0c697d28928f479a073f1b9","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10.374636Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10.374636Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2412.01459","source_version":2,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"ijKnrJhUSFoeuThD6wCcvcFZRmJYu0AsVEFS00WduEkbbJ/QkFFug1xmQn8ZNU6hbXb7z11oYWq0xyyl0nCcCA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-08-05T17:04:17.157635Z"},"content_sha256":"8e6691aaacee1266d5104632dd69800f00eaa6ae11f221dd51b01dc46cc587df","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:8e6691aaacee1266d5104632dd69800f00eaa6ae11f221dd51b01dc46cc587df"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2024:6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Perception Gaps in Risk, Benefit, and Value Between Experts and Public Challenge Socially Accepted AI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Experts anticipate higher AI probabilities, lower risks, greater benefits, and more positive value than the public across 71 scenarios.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Felix Glawe, Gian Luca Liehner, Luisa Vervier, Martina Ziefle, Philipp Brauner","submitted_at":"2024-12-02T12:51:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping many societal domains, raising critical questions about its risks, benefits, and the potential misalignment between public and academic perspectives. This study examines how the general public (N=1110) -- individuals who interact with or are impacted by AI technologies -- and academic AI experts (N=119) -- those elites shaping AI development -- perceive AI's capabilities and impact across 71 scenarios. These scenarios span domains such as sustainability, healthcare, job performance, societal inequality, art, and warfare. Participants evaluated these sc"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"experts consistently anticipate higher probabilities, perceive lower risks, report greater benefits, and express more positive sentiment toward AI compared to the non-experts. Moreover, both groups apply different weighting schemes: experts discount risk more heavily relative to benefit than non-experts.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The samples of 119 academic AI experts and 1,110 public respondents are representative of their respective populations and that self-reported ratings on the four dimensions accurately capture true perceptions without bias from question framing or social desirability.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Experts anticipate higher AI probabilities, lower risks, greater benefits, and more positive value than the public across 71 scenarios.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"2aa3b2d6a715de5d319a01e68d9fd5e93908f4e0b5f7a0b82b4eb942e3d35686"},"source":{"id":"2412.01459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"01d6a89e-d02b-483c-a7e7-514e6c32a13a","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-23T08:32:39.741551Z","strongest_claim":"experts consistently anticipate higher probabilities, perceive lower risks, report greater benefits, and express more positive sentiment toward AI compared to the non-experts. Moreover, both groups apply different weighting schemes: experts discount risk more heavily relative to benefit than non-experts.","one_line_summary":"Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The samples of 119 academic AI experts and 1,110 public respondents are representative of their respective populations and that self-reported ratings on the four dimensions accurately capture true perceptions without bias from question framing or social desirability.","pith_extraction_headline":"Experts anticipate higher AI probabilities, lower risks, greater benefits, and more positive value than the public across 71 scenarios."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.01459/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":84,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"Experts evaluate topics left of the line as less likely, topics right of the line as more likely","work_id":"4326c35d-7a3b-47e7-a206-70439c504e32","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2021,"title":"5.1 Diverging Expectations for the Future of AI First and foremost, experts and the public diverged significantly in their expectations regarding the likelihood of AI developments","work_id":"b8030045-43e1-42fe-ab0d-9702d557985b","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1967,"title":"we shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us","work_id":"5fe05391-e211-4530-ba7e-d1be6da1032d","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"the tools of their tools","work_id":"124f4111-cf68-43f1-862e-2a07061c673d","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1960,"title":"In this section, we analyze the data but now treating each topic (rather than each individual) as the unit of analysis","work_id":"349b537b-e115-43e0-b644-65c3456d85f5","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":84,"snapshot_sha256":"60ccb8cabbed86c376fbc9c50fc822115ef8d7cbe07309b7f8458fbbe352c485","internal_anchors":3},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"01d6a89e-d02b-483c-a7e7-514e6c32a13a"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"F+sn8QAqiQKb1XqdOEWn1+FVI0+xgSYUSP0Pg2RtJRF1Lg5p88LQrHcSjs2sHOzmZHBw9PPfLgYTlAHm8QRxAA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-08-05T17:04:17.158272Z"},"content_sha256":"a5e871cf7a54077587f6b40b4e88d7a406d8cf89caf57f6b34ebd0513527443e","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:a5e871cf7a54077587f6b40b4e88d7a406d8cf89caf57f6b34ebd0513527443e"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-08-05T17:04:17Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2024:6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX2E3YVOOAWH","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"06b3d3eb26e4ba7f6f3af82db6813285060b4af180244317468fc78a7ae619de","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-12-02T12:51:45Z","title_canon_sha256":"507c64efbd2e4fda537b64f97609f729869152764d6ed3c5176c6d385f1aa122"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2412.01459","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.01459","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.01459v2","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.01459","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6V4II2NK5TO6","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6V4II2NK5TO6UCBX","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6V4II2NK","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:a5e871cf7a54077587f6b40b4e88d7a406d8cf89caf57f6b34ebd0513527443e","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"experts consistently anticipate higher probabilities, perceive lower risks, report greater benefits, and express more positive sentiment toward AI compared to the non-experts. Moreover, both groups apply different weighting schemes: experts discount risk more heavily relative to benefit than non-experts."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The samples of 119 academic AI experts and 1,110 public respondents are representative of their respective populations and that self-reported ratings on the four dimensions accurately capture true perceptions without bias from question framing or social desirability."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Experts anticipate higher AI probabilities, lower risks, greater benefits, and more positive value than the public across 71 scenarios."}],"snapshot_sha256":"2aa3b2d6a715de5d319a01e68d9fd5e93908f4e0b5f7a0b82b4eb942e3d35686"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"integrity":{"available":true,"clean":true,"detectors_run":[],"endpoint":"/pith/2412.01459/integrity.json","findings":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938","summary":{"advisory":0,"by_detector":{},"critical":0,"informational":0}},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping many societal domains, raising critical questions about its risks, benefits, and the potential misalignment between public and academic perspectives. This study examines how the general public (N=1110) -- individuals who interact with or are impacted by AI technologies -- and academic AI experts (N=119) -- those elites shaping AI development -- perceive AI's capabilities and impact across 71 scenarios. These scenarios span domains such as sustainability, healthcare, job performance, societal inequality, art, and warfare. Participants evaluated these sc","authors_text":"Felix Glawe, Gian Luca Liehner, Luisa Vervier, Martina Ziefle, Philipp Brauner","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"headline":"Experts anticipate higher AI probabilities, lower risks, greater benefits, and more positive value than the public across 71 scenarios.","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-12-02T12:51:45Z","title":"Perception Gaps in Risk, Benefit, and Value Between Experts and Public Challenge Socially Accepted AI"},"references":{"count":84,"internal_anchors":3,"resolved_work":84,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Experts evaluate topics left of the line as less likely, topics right of the line as more likely","work_id":"4326c35d-7a3b-47e7-a206-70439c504e32","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"5.1 Diverging Expectations for the Future of AI First and foremost, experts and the public diverged significantly in their expectations regarding the likelihood of AI developments","work_id":"b8030045-43e1-42fe-ab0d-9702d557985b","year":2021},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"we shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us","work_id":"5fe05391-e211-4530-ba7e-d1be6da1032d","year":1967},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"the tools of their tools","work_id":"124f4111-cf68-43f1-862e-2a07061c673d","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"In this section, we analyze the data but now treating each topic (rather than each individual) as the unit of analysis","work_id":"349b537b-e115-43e0-b644-65c3456d85f5","year":1960}],"snapshot_sha256":"60ccb8cabbed86c376fbc9c50fc822115ef8d7cbe07309b7f8458fbbe352c485"},"source":{"id":"2412.01459","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-23T08:32:39.741551Z","id":"01d6a89e-d02b-483c-a7e7-514e6c32a13a","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Experts rate AI scenarios as more likely, less risky, more beneficial, and more valuable than the public, applying different weightings to risk versus benefit.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Experts anticipate higher AI probabilities, lower risks, greater benefits, and more positive value than the public across 71 scenarios.","strongest_claim":"experts consistently anticipate higher probabilities, perceive lower risks, report greater benefits, and express more positive sentiment toward AI compared to the non-experts. Moreover, both groups apply different weighting schemes: experts discount risk more heavily relative to benefit than non-experts.","weakest_assumption":"The samples of 119 academic AI experts and 1,110 public respondents are representative of their respective populations and that self-reported ratings on the four dimensions accurately capture true perceptions without bias from question framing or social desirability."}},"verdict_id":"01d6a89e-d02b-483c-a7e7-514e6c32a13a"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:8e6691aaacee1266d5104632dd69800f00eaa6ae11f221dd51b01dc46cc587df","target":"record","created_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"06b3d3eb26e4ba7f6f3af82db6813285060b4af180244317468fc78a7ae619de","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-12-02T12:51:45Z","title_canon_sha256":"507c64efbd2e4fda537b64f97609f729869152764d6ed3c5176c6d385f1aa122"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2412.01459","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"canonical_sha256":"f5788469aaecddea0837d1378ab9c0b1d08c28f1e0c697d28928f479a073f1b9","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"f5788469aaecddea0837d1378ab9c0b1d08c28f1e0c697d28928f479a073f1b9","first_computed_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10.374636Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10.374636Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"wcMty2E6Ny0HMuG5BDZ1x69VM0dsGlQ7Pjp3D82ajaS/J8PB2yib5ZC9+P6BtP3Lji7w5k+8DONSwOPMFJZdAQ==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-06-11T01:09:10.375851Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2412.01459","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":2}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:8e6691aaacee1266d5104632dd69800f00eaa6ae11f221dd51b01dc46cc587df","sha256:a5e871cf7a54077587f6b40b4e88d7a406d8cf89caf57f6b34ebd0513527443e"],"state_sha256":"0ebe5b45038c12b239ed12ce08b6c35622f7925d12478f1f54c00d5c92e6a1df"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"huFMP8VPqlfCEkQPqmeaOJKm6esNAgtLYMvrFGPUftCH50a6NoGSVKA5ElrqyFP23GtJLrXS2Ogl5ufpuPU5DA==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-08-05T17:04:17.163017Z","bundle_sha256":"7b5ab15ecf0823c744ad344ef115d8b1d3e1de8da0a794feb416e912cd0edb00"}}