{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62","short_pith_number":"pith:6VXKVRKE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f56eaac544c9bb725bc91c0907a308f6b521ddbde9c008a585d83d57e7700af0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1204.5708","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bell inequality and common causal explanation in algebraic quantum field theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"G\\'abor Hofer-Szab\\'o, P\\'eter Vecserny\\'es","submitted_at":"2012-04-25T17:03:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bell inequalities, understood as constraints between classical conditional probabilities, can be derived from a set of assumptions representing a common causal explanation of classical correlations. A similar derivation, however, is not known for Bell inequalities in algebraic quantum field theories establishing constraints for the expectation of specific linear combinations of projections in a quantum state. In the paper we address the question as to whether a 'common causal justification' of these non-classical Bell inequalities is possible. We will show that although the classical notion of"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1204.5708","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2012-04-25T17:03:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b71d26848ffccdad01ff8dcb94254eb0f576703a9937243a38d609513b2e4074","abstract_canon_sha256":"b9b9892b280148cc17d910941b385a4c4efb26e62bb3b99d8ece276fbc8c1852"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.561295Z","signature_b64":"MaEMT8RVLj/L6d0J07T8A8Qf5GodPaQ0sV9TY/8bvwTeoZ0epXH2ZIB67mAn3u58NaX7JzjmfyKiqRnSyQkVCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f56eaac544c9bb725bc91c0907a308f6b521ddbde9c008a585d83d57e7700af0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560355Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560355Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bell inequality and common causal explanation in algebraic quantum field theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"G\\'abor Hofer-Szab\\'o, P\\'eter Vecserny\\'es","submitted_at":"2012-04-25T17:03:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Bell inequalities, understood as constraints between classical conditional probabilities, can be derived from a set of assumptions representing a common causal explanation of classical correlations. A similar derivation, however, is not known for Bell inequalities in algebraic quantum field theories establishing constraints for the expectation of specific linear combinations of projections in a quantum state. In the paper we address the question as to whether a 'common causal justification' of these non-classical Bell inequalities is possible. We will show that although the classical notion of"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1204.5708","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1204.5708","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560515+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1204.5708v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560515+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1204.5708","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560515+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6VXKVRKEZG5X","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:56.085431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6J","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:56.085431+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6VXKVRKE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:56.085431+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29589","citing_title":"Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6VXKVRKE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6VXKVRKE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1204.5708&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6VXKVRKEZG5XEW6JDQEQPIYI62/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560515+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:57:01.560515+00:00"}