{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT","short_pith_number":"pith:6WEWLIOA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f58965a1c070c0827578ffaf58b1a9ccffa20f505da082dd375ea14ae96543b3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1807.08203","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"From LTL to rLTL Monitoring: Improved Monitorability through Robust Semantics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.FL","authors_text":"Alexander Weinert, Corto Mascle, Daniel Neider, Martin Zimmermann, Maximilian Schwenger, Paulo Tabuada","submitted_at":"2018-07-21T20:23:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Runtime monitoring is commonly used to detect the violation of desired properties in safety critical cyber-physical systems by observing its executions. Bauer et al. introduced an influential framework for monitoring Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) properties based on a three-valued semantics: the formula is already satisfied by the given prefix, it is already violated, or it is still undetermined, i.e., it can still be satisfied and violated by appropriate extensions. However, a wide range of formulas are not monitorable under this approach, meaning that they have a prefix for which satisfaction "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1807.08203","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.FL","submitted_at":"2018-07-21T20:23:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"01af4a2ca8edeaeefec181336872f3b70260c8cdeeee5a4c031b09a5fd9d15bf","abstract_canon_sha256":"1d7ccd1f8ddbd1666de7cc3981f95450d73958a8e367c99e76801ca3692b0871"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.192032Z","signature_b64":"I6/A9au8z4eBQIoU0fXBImj+XyBmFMecFydi7tEscXtrPwefOU9GyeQGUY3xf9BZUkfgkRFvT50w1G1ws/AZAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f58965a1c070c0827578ffaf58b1a9ccffa20f505da082dd375ea14ae96543b3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191614Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191614Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"From LTL to rLTL Monitoring: Improved Monitorability through Robust Semantics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.FL","authors_text":"Alexander Weinert, Corto Mascle, Daniel Neider, Martin Zimmermann, Maximilian Schwenger, Paulo Tabuada","submitted_at":"2018-07-21T20:23:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Runtime monitoring is commonly used to detect the violation of desired properties in safety critical cyber-physical systems by observing its executions. Bauer et al. introduced an influential framework for monitoring Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) properties based on a three-valued semantics: the formula is already satisfied by the given prefix, it is already violated, or it is still undetermined, i.e., it can still be satisfied and violated by appropriate extensions. However, a wide range of formulas are not monitorable under this approach, meaning that they have a prefix for which satisfaction "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1807.08203","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1807.08203/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1807.08203","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1807.08203v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1807.08203","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6WEWLIOAODAI","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6WEWLIOA","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.01388","citing_title":"Why Formal Monitors Fail: Attack Distribution Entropy as a Coverage Bound for LTL-Based LLM Agent Safety","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6WEWLIOA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6WEWLIOA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1807.08203&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6WEWLIOAODAIE5LY76XVRMNJZT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:56:08.191668+00:00"}