{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54","short_pith_number":"pith:6WZWRDDZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f5b3688c79e3a1660195595f60ebafef247d88842bd6b205a610bb8c6f79ab8f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2207.14438","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurements","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CC","cs.IT","cs.LG","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Angus Lowe, Ashwin Nayak","submitted_at":"2022-07-29T02:26:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the problems of quantum tomography and shadow tomography using measurements performed on individual, identical copies of an unknown $d$-dimensional state. We first revisit a known lower bound due to Haah et al. (2017) on quantum tomography with accuracy $\\epsilon$ in trace distance, when the measurements choices are independent of previously observed outcomes (i.e., they are nonadaptive). We give a succinct proof of this result. This leads to stronger lower bounds when the learner uses measurements with a constant number of outcomes. In particular, this rigorously establishes the opti"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2207.14438","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2022-07-29T02:26:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","cs.IT","cs.LG","math.IT"],"title_canon_sha256":"db058c14dfc89a41cd8ef39536d1175ba9decc5c0b58dc8659102ae9c8cbb727","abstract_canon_sha256":"5ef24a823e0a460780309f7af4c8128fcabb9fd9b7ee07dc68a3bdd3d2e39114"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.380067Z","signature_b64":"1k8PjQlpRmVjNUTS6mfrRiIPYKtc+2715HNq7ANKPx+SAIgtj7SIxxGXSCVmie/AgmwkcqJLpX9CIto8z6TvCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f5b3688c79e3a1660195595f60ebafef247d88842bd6b205a610bb8c6f79ab8f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379626Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379626Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurements","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CC","cs.IT","cs.LG","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Angus Lowe, Ashwin Nayak","submitted_at":"2022-07-29T02:26:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the problems of quantum tomography and shadow tomography using measurements performed on individual, identical copies of an unknown $d$-dimensional state. We first revisit a known lower bound due to Haah et al. (2017) on quantum tomography with accuracy $\\epsilon$ in trace distance, when the measurements choices are independent of previously observed outcomes (i.e., they are nonadaptive). We give a succinct proof of this result. This leads to stronger lower bounds when the learner uses measurements with a constant number of outcomes. In particular, this rigorously establishes the opti"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2207.14438","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2207.14438/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2207.14438","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2207.14438v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2207.14438","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6WZWRDDZ4OQW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6WZWRDDZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.04500","citing_title":"Fast quantum measurement tomography with optimal error bounds","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6WZWRDDZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6WZWRDDZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2207.14438&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6WZWRDDZ4OQWMAMVLFPWB25P54/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:19:17.379680+00:00"}