{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4","short_pith_number":"pith:6XG3F42G","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f5cdb2f3460b6aa6c358ab11a0aab05f38b3d94b4eb9ef07c7bd36866fccd8e9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.02275","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machine","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","hep-ex","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Marco Letizia, Riccardo Torre, Samuele Grossi","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T10:42:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rise of generative models for scientific research calls for the development of new methods to evaluate their fidelity. A natural framework for addressing this problem is two-sample hypothesis testing, namely the task of determining whether two data sets are drawn from the same distribution. In large-scale and high-dimensional regimes, machine learning offers a set of tools to push beyond the limitations of standard statistical techniques. In this work, we put this claim to the test by comparing a recent proposal from the high-energy physics literature, the New Physics Learning Machine, to "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.02275","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T10:42:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","hep-ex","hep-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"f614b7e45fb2c339f934e2f00fcac637b64e2808735b72f8268b32aad01ffa30","abstract_canon_sha256":"6bf85dd1bffa1e565fd0f4c4bfeda2abb9ed24a65fbe4d4314bcd1d9f2d1087d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450913Z","signature_b64":"1f8WeboCSLRKLCzwe5ajQFtW3DfHaO01CJuQK/4HHgKh78Un+5Y4MII5NoF8+clWRtwxGhh+y4MXhet96XD2CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f5cdb2f3460b6aa6c358ab11a0aab05f38b3d94b4eb9ef07c7bd36866fccd8e9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450352Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450352Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machine","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","hep-ex","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Marco Letizia, Riccardo Torre, Samuele Grossi","submitted_at":"2025-08-04T10:42:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rise of generative models for scientific research calls for the development of new methods to evaluate their fidelity. A natural framework for addressing this problem is two-sample hypothesis testing, namely the task of determining whether two data sets are drawn from the same distribution. In large-scale and high-dimensional regimes, machine learning offers a set of tools to push beyond the limitations of standard statistical techniques. In this work, we put this claim to the test by comparing a recent proposal from the high-energy physics literature, the New Physics Learning Machine, to "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.02275","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.02275/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.02275","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.02275v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.02275","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"6XG3F42GBNVK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"6XG3F42G","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.28940","citing_title":"Neural Scaling Laws for Jet Generation","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6XG3F42G"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/6XG3F42G","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.02275&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/6XG3F42GBNVKNQ2YVMI2BKVQL4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:48:11.450413+00:00"}