{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ","short_pith_number":"pith:747MQKJ5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ff3ec8293d03c1223422f655e2a0ec726dbbe465664ef8f0d2b42c1bbef91a27","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2204.01790","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Leaders or Followers? A Temporal Analysis of Tweets from IRA Trolls","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Anita Nikolich, Aron Culotta, Libby Hemphill, Matthew A. Shapiro, Mustafa Bilgic, Siva K. Balasubramanian","submitted_at":"2022-04-04T18:37:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Internet Research Agency (IRA) influences online political conversations in the United States, exacerbating existing partisan divides and sowing discord. In this paper we investigate the IRA's communication strategies by analyzing trending terms on Twitter to identify cases in which the IRA leads or follows other users. Our analysis focuses on over 38M tweets posted between 2016 and 2017 from IRA users (n=3,613), journalists (n=976), members of Congress (n=526), and politically engaged users from the general public (n=71,128). We find that the IRA tends to lead on topics related to the 201"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2204.01790","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2022-04-04T18:37:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"79b15a3513b6ea7c17d810742cf9e87bc7d9e8f6a0ec8b25f7b7c8bc26321b1e","abstract_canon_sha256":"ef99d78ac75febd25082dc2fc0678975c8196c4ea621b92b1271066d7b9f6ddf"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064997Z","signature_b64":"mY/0Gc7cyifBOVswWICy8/zDLpdFN2sDiobALfPAQsMBpQmYprpPzOnYq1FXZO1ULIFUqPj/B2l/kQEkk3i3Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ff3ec8293d03c1223422f655e2a0ec726dbbe465664ef8f0d2b42c1bbef91a27","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064551Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064551Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Leaders or Followers? A Temporal Analysis of Tweets from IRA Trolls","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Anita Nikolich, Aron Culotta, Libby Hemphill, Matthew A. Shapiro, Mustafa Bilgic, Siva K. Balasubramanian","submitted_at":"2022-04-04T18:37:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Internet Research Agency (IRA) influences online political conversations in the United States, exacerbating existing partisan divides and sowing discord. In this paper we investigate the IRA's communication strategies by analyzing trending terms on Twitter to identify cases in which the IRA leads or follows other users. Our analysis focuses on over 38M tweets posted between 2016 and 2017 from IRA users (n=3,613), journalists (n=976), members of Congress (n=526), and politically engaged users from the general public (n=71,128). We find that the IRA tends to lead on topics related to the 201"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2204.01790","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2204.01790/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2204.01790","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2204.01790v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2204.01790","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"747MQKJ5APAS","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"747MQKJ5APASENBC","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"747MQKJ5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/747MQKJ5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/747MQKJ5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2204.01790&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/747MQKJ5APASENBC6ZK6FIHMOJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:11:33.064610+00:00"}