{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR","short_pith_number":"pith:74T2KZXH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ff27a566e707135d31ffa6f8ed38582c4dbdc9de85c66b9ce61dbf53c5abfc56","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.12250","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The P behind Q: Empirical Evidence from Physical Drift in Put-Call Parity","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Physical drift improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in index options.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","authors_text":"Useong Shin","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T15:19:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Put-call parity is a terminal-payoff identity, but its enforcement is capital-using. I study the carry gap, the annualized wedge between option-implied and OIS discount factors, in SPX and RUT index options. Quoted parity is tightly compressed, while the synthetic-traded forward channel leaves a systematic wedge. I interpret this wedge as an implementation premium under finite arbitrage capital. A drift-preserving GBM term, r {\\mu}-hat {\\tau}, improves in-sample and leave-one-year-out fit, especially in SPX. The evidence suggests that physical drift enters not option payoffs, but the process e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.12250","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T15:19:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"369709271cae88d40713b4321438b18f6f031f88f679fb2d5a26685d88262d49","abstract_canon_sha256":"05811728b3bb63310f6f71447ffb8cc1693466ea505b263c2501a210702d536e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.407229Z","signature_b64":"7p/4VWanb+zXuVlHXjn91qOazSZxof8cXUU19i5hi1eaOP+f2qzwGfz42ve70mw7jtXCDfJV3fCKDEp4F3eDDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ff27a566e707135d31ffa6f8ed38582c4dbdc9de85c66b9ce61dbf53c5abfc56","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406388Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406388Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The P behind Q: Empirical Evidence from Physical Drift in Put-Call Parity","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Physical drift improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in index options.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","authors_text":"Useong Shin","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T15:19:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"Put-call parity is a terminal-payoff identity, but its enforcement is capital-using. I study the carry gap, the annualized wedge between option-implied and OIS discount factors, in SPX and RUT index options. Quoted parity is tightly compressed, while the synthetic-traded forward channel leaves a systematic wedge. I interpret this wedge as an implementation premium under finite arbitrage capital. A drift-preserving GBM term, r {\\mu}-hat {\\tau}, improves in-sample and leave-one-year-out fit, especially in SPX. The evidence suggests that physical drift enters not option payoffs, but the process e"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Empirically, the drift term improves both in-sample and leave-one-year-out fit, especially for SPX, consistent with drift-sensitive margin burden in parity enforcement rather than a failure of no-arbitrage.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the lagged rolling-OLS trend proxy for the physical drift μ accurately captures the component relevant to margin burden in enforcing put-call parity, and that the derived (rμτ) extension to the GBM implementation-risk term correctly isolates this effect without other unmodeled factors.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Empirical evidence shows that a drift term (rμτ) added to GBM implementation risk improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in SPX and RUT options, pointing to drift-sensitive margin burden.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Physical drift improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in index options.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"3f36cd23fa33e1f8b282f58b1c2b1528521995e103288709ebccc23fc16f4284"},"source":{"id":"2605.12250","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":"8bc62feb-5282-4d91-a134-4bff77e080ee","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T20:36:58.566936Z","strongest_claim":"Empirically, the drift term improves both in-sample and leave-one-year-out fit, especially for SPX, consistent with drift-sensitive margin burden in parity enforcement rather than a failure of no-arbitrage.","one_line_summary":"Empirical evidence shows that a drift term (rμτ) added to GBM implementation risk improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in SPX and RUT options, pointing to drift-sensitive margin burden.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the lagged rolling-OLS trend proxy for the physical drift μ accurately captures the component relevant to margin burden in enforcing put-call parity, and that the derived (rμτ) extension to the GBM implementation-risk term correctly isolates this effect without other unmodeled factors.","pith_extraction_headline":"Physical drift improves the fit of put-call parity carry gaps in index options."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.12250/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T22:41:58.343195Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T10:40:59.586026Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T08:31:17.099572Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T07:46:51.046974Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"1ea937ae6ea8ec0a7c31b203682e2f73619a7a0ebedce43028e5331945deb2d7"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"0d9d7deeede09f12129c044ba934c1eafcce9a467bfe0dc69b3917a413ec6b28"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.12250","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.12250v3","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.12250","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"74T2KZXHA4JV","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"74T2KZXH","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR","json":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/74T2KZXH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/74T2KZXH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.12250&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/74T2KZXHA4JV2MP7U34O2OCYFR/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:04:36.406527+00:00"}