{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY","short_pith_number":"pith:75KJF3HH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ff5492ece744be114e036b6047e9ad9e3f82283b76cbf6724af6399169f8a837","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.10333","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Reply to: Large Exomoons unlikely around Kepler-1625 b and Kepler-1708 b","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","authors_text":"Alex Teachey, Ben Cassese, Billy Quarles, Brad Hansen, Chris Burke, Daniel A. Yahalomi, David Kipping, Judit Szul\\'agyi, Kevin Hardegree-Ullman, Steve Bryson","submitted_at":"2024-01-18T19:00:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, Heller & Hippke argued that the exomoon candidates Kepler-1625 b-i and Kepler-1708 b-i were allegedly 'refuted'. In this Matters Arising, we address these claims. For Kepler-1625 b, we show that their Hubble light curve is identical to that previously published by the same lead author, in which the moon-like dip was recovered. Indeed, our fits of their data again recover the moon-like dip with improved residuals than that obtained by Heller & Hippke. Their fits therefore appear to have somehow missed this deeper likelihood maximum, as well producing apparently unconverged posteriors."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.10333","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","submitted_at":"2024-01-18T19:00:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.IM"],"title_canon_sha256":"1d4a0c7f9485afe133de3b67880f3e395ef531fba77876966add9c0e1de168b0","abstract_canon_sha256":"3541fb7ddf2588a59aeaee508992e59aaec423733d4d11c41a9c561e539b9d60"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299943Z","signature_b64":"74qD5ddnFWb3MIQGbVBolyLrAfYhBClvV+49lsdskNeGpYsbuZRskN5SCK0T12rB3OVgXwf2Sg22vbvg5xtDDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ff5492ece744be114e036b6047e9ad9e3f82283b76cbf6724af6399169f8a837","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299453Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299453Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Reply to: Large Exomoons unlikely around Kepler-1625 b and Kepler-1708 b","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","authors_text":"Alex Teachey, Ben Cassese, Billy Quarles, Brad Hansen, Chris Burke, Daniel A. Yahalomi, David Kipping, Judit Szul\\'agyi, Kevin Hardegree-Ullman, Steve Bryson","submitted_at":"2024-01-18T19:00:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, Heller & Hippke argued that the exomoon candidates Kepler-1625 b-i and Kepler-1708 b-i were allegedly 'refuted'. In this Matters Arising, we address these claims. For Kepler-1625 b, we show that their Hubble light curve is identical to that previously published by the same lead author, in which the moon-like dip was recovered. Indeed, our fits of their data again recover the moon-like dip with improved residuals than that obtained by Heller & Hippke. Their fits therefore appear to have somehow missed this deeper likelihood maximum, as well producing apparently unconverged posteriors."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.10333","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.10333/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.10333","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.10333v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.10333","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"75KJF3HHIS7B","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"75KJF3HHIS7BCTQD","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"75KJF3HH","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.12258","citing_title":"Orbital Stability of Hierarchical 3 and 4-Body Systems with Inclination: Results for Kepler-1625, 1708, and HD 23079","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/75KJF3HH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/75KJF3HH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.10333&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/75KJF3HHIS7BCTQDNNQEP2NNTY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:35:10.299511+00:00"}