{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ","short_pith_number":"pith:75VUVBT2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ff6b4a867a67a1f948a3ee69311591a4374c3d91699da6b7ed00584e96f72b21","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.19098","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Christos Diou, George Fragiadakis, George Kousiouris, Mara Nikolaidou","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T12:52:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in working environments with individuals, known as Human-AI Collaboration (HAIC), has become essential in a variety of domains, boosting decision-making, efficiency, and innovation. Despite HAIC's wide potential, evaluating its effectiveness remains challenging due to the complex interaction of components involved.\n  This paper provides a detailed analysis of existing HAIC evaluation approaches and develops a fresh paradigm for more effectively evaluating these systems.\n  Our framework includes a structured decision tree which assists to select relevant "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.19098","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T12:52:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"90fa51c05d91e1b8df2c7306b7706d42509dd7bad6858c7456c632fba0a9a009","abstract_canon_sha256":"ad6b3bca4c91a25fcccae53a8f9dd078b4fc6a012f0f30015920a06b41b43198"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.451060Z","signature_b64":"pdCO2JBe9mrOCrfeh8o5OVPqXm88zEDF0gK3SH1gR0gz++TcozpTjnP9RR6jPBSgNJtaIcO3ytYfUsBC3JKWCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ff6b4a867a67a1f948a3ee69311591a4374c3d91699da6b7ed00584e96f72b21","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450470Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450470Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Christos Diou, George Fragiadakis, George Kousiouris, Mara Nikolaidou","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T12:52:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in working environments with individuals, known as Human-AI Collaboration (HAIC), has become essential in a variety of domains, boosting decision-making, efficiency, and innovation. Despite HAIC's wide potential, evaluating its effectiveness remains challenging due to the complex interaction of components involved.\n  This paper provides a detailed analysis of existing HAIC evaluation approaches and develops a fresh paradigm for more effectively evaluating these systems.\n  Our framework includes a structured decision tree which assists to select relevant "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.19098","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.19098/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.19098","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.19098v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.19098","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"75VUVBT2M6Q7","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"75VUVBT2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":12,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30930","citing_title":"TUX: Measuring Human--AI Tacit Understanding","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21351","citing_title":"The Human-AI Delegation-Verification Dilemma: Individual Strategies, Collective Equilibria and Sociotechnical Lock-in","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21351","citing_title":"The Human-AI Delegation-Verification Dilemma: Individual Strategies, Collective Equilibria and Sociotechnical Lock-in","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.26146","citing_title":"Augment Engineering: A Methodology for Multi-Tool AI Orchestration Across Professional Domains","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.24729","citing_title":"\"It Felt a Bit Eerie\": Exploring Humanlike Interactions During Collaborative Writing with an Artificial Agent","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29675","citing_title":"From Prompts to Context: An Ontology-Driven Framework for Human-Generative AI Collaboration","ref_index":92,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21351","citing_title":"The Human-AI Delegation-Verification Dilemma: Individual Strategies, Collective Equilibria and Sociotechnical Lock-in","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21351","citing_title":"The Human-AI Delegation-Verification Dilemma: Individual Strategies, Collective Equilibria and Sociotechnical Lock-in","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15064","citing_title":"After the Interface: Relocating Human Agency in the Age of Conversational AI","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26590","citing_title":"Recommendations for Efficient and Responsible LLM Adoption within Industrial Software Development","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05368","citing_title":"AI and Collective Decisions: Strengthening Legitimacy and Losers' Consent","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15607","citing_title":"Imperfectly Cooperative Human-AI Interactions: Comparing the Impacts of Human and AI Attributes in Simulated and User Studies","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/75VUVBT2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/75VUVBT2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.19098&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/75VUVBT2M6Q7SSFD5ZUTCFMRUQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:26:05.450554+00:00"}