{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD","short_pith_number":"pith:77AMC2N3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ffc0c169bb9622c0fccf91aa942a7908d798b4f20320855ae8e13e7eeb76eeaa","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.08727","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Intervention effects based on potential benefit","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Alexander W. Levis, Edward H. Kennedy, Eli Ben-Michael","submitted_at":"2024-05-14T16:12:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Optimal treatment rules are mappings from individual patient characteristics to tailored treatment assignments that maximize mean outcomes. In this work, we introduce a conditional potential benefit (CPB) metric that measures the expected improvement under an optimally chosen treatment compared to the status quo, within covariate strata. The potential benefit combines (i) the magnitude of the treatment effect, and (ii) the propensity for subjects to naturally select a suboptimal treatment. As a consequence, heterogeneity in the CPB can provide key insights into the mechanism by which a treatme"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.08727","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-05-14T16:12:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"485907e702d99cc5ec731ded3fc6f8ce3adac354f1a10194a691e50043651fef","abstract_canon_sha256":"1c2b02011244fdee22ddd67f6ff74b8dffd5b6cf10dbe42fc3f9d1231024f285"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111908Z","signature_b64":"rpyRC/GAY2WvB+v3czLOmulx5+zTVY4nlSgeO2hsaxtugYQbzMNDQvjb/PwfzAkZxU52h6BTE2zCoKn+ybOZDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ffc0c169bb9622c0fccf91aa942a7908d798b4f20320855ae8e13e7eeb76eeaa","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111444Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111444Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Intervention effects based on potential benefit","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Alexander W. Levis, Edward H. Kennedy, Eli Ben-Michael","submitted_at":"2024-05-14T16:12:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Optimal treatment rules are mappings from individual patient characteristics to tailored treatment assignments that maximize mean outcomes. In this work, we introduce a conditional potential benefit (CPB) metric that measures the expected improvement under an optimally chosen treatment compared to the status quo, within covariate strata. The potential benefit combines (i) the magnitude of the treatment effect, and (ii) the propensity for subjects to naturally select a suboptimal treatment. As a consequence, heterogeneity in the CPB can provide key insights into the mechanism by which a treatme"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.08727","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.08727/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.08727","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.08727v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.08727","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"77AMC2N3SYRM","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"77AMC2N3SYRMB7GP","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"77AMC2N3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21050","citing_title":"Triage Score: A Counterfactual Risk Assessment Instrument","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01050","citing_title":"Trust Me, I'm a Doctor?","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01050","citing_title":"Trust Me, I'm a Doctor?","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/77AMC2N3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/77AMC2N3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.08727&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/77AMC2N3SYRMB7GPSGVJIKTZBD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:00:04.111498+00:00"}