{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ","short_pith_number":"pith:77ND325O","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14473","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"6c9c81e9d35063e4c00451fd0995231e84743f587ecef3eb40743ad8e0c02b20","abstract_canon_sha256":"f138f6f9a4eba5851f243efa10d55fa3aa4529f52b58a3d9414ee2cf1929cbf5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"ffda3debae30fd9136bcf708839bdc3a57a67a6b425ab93b4fe277051de3c3d8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.14473","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14473","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14473v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14473","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"77ND325OGD6Z","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"77ND325OGD6ZCNV4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"77ND325O","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14473","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"6c9c81e9d35063e4c00451fd0995231e84743f587ecef3eb40743ad8e0c02b20","abstract_canon_sha256":"f138f6f9a4eba5851f243efa10d55fa3aa4529f52b58a3d9414ee2cf1929cbf5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"ffda3debae30fd9136bcf708839bdc3a57a67a6b425ab93b4fe277051de3c3d8","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06.636964Z","signature_b64":"MSEgfYTuR28mDbVQEAkJMGh3n6JhL61BjYUz2rWFXHbGZpjcHQ78SCl4s2vgaxws++YRoEPrtKeHGg6kKhPyBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ffda3debae30fd9136bcf708839bdc3a57a67a6b425ab93b4fe277051de3c3d8","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06.636181Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06.636181Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.14473","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"I9DlG08NHU6Zwcx238om3tDOjG/7goftAWh6h5iuUzaqKsGpf9qO34W6eVzs3JDtb2LU5qSwZpP7gBTuDis3Bw==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-27T18:38:33.733529Z"},"content_sha256":"3876cfa0c6789c4345774a6ebdc028a0de63d6433c1f9770ce3167fc19e61214","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:3876cfa0c6789c4345774a6ebdc028a0de63d6433c1f9770ce3167fc19e61214"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Context-Driven Decomposition diagnoses when RAG follows conflicting retrieved context over its own knowledge.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Huan Xu, Pin Qian, Shuhuai Lin, Sipeng Zhang, Su Wang, Xinpeng Wei, Yihang Chen","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"The Context-Compliance Regime in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) occurs when retrieved context dominates\n  the final answer even when it conflicts with the model's parametric knowledge. Accuracy alone does not reveal\n  how retrieved context causally shapes answers under such conflict. We introduce Context-Driven Decomposition\n  (CDD), a belief-decomposition probe that operates at inference time and serves as an intervention mechanism for\n  controlled retrieval conflict. Across Epi-Scale stress tests, TruthfulQA misconception injection, and cross-\n  model reruns, CDD exposes three patterns"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"CDD exposes three patterns: context compliance is measurable in adversarial settings (Standard RAG reaches 15.0% accuracy on TruthfulQA misconception injection), adversarial accuracy gains transfer across model families but rationale-answer causal coupling does not (CDD reaches 64.1% mistake-injection causal sensitivity on Gemini-2.5-Flash while Claude variants fall in [-3%, +7%]), and explicit conflict decomposition improves robustness under temporal drift (71.3%) and noisy distractors (69.9%) on Epi-Scale.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the belief-decomposition probe at inference time accurately isolates the causal contribution of retrieved context to the final answer without the intervention itself altering the model's reasoning process or introducing new artifacts.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Context-Driven Decomposition (CDD) measures context compliance in RAG under knowledge conflicts and improves accuracy on adversarial benchmarks like TruthfulQA misconception injection and Epi-Scale tests across models.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Context-Driven Decomposition diagnoses when RAG follows conflicting retrieved context over its own knowledge.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"1bfc07b2bbd7203a708b38a5ba098d4e5d07c4c7ef41db395d12ae09dbe7e1ec"},"source":{"id":"2605.14473","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"264bbe3d-6d85-4a42-b3f5-03adc301c56e","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T01:59:46.144779Z","strongest_claim":"CDD exposes three patterns: context compliance is measurable in adversarial settings (Standard RAG reaches 15.0% accuracy on TruthfulQA misconception injection), adversarial accuracy gains transfer across model families but rationale-answer causal coupling does not (CDD reaches 64.1% mistake-injection causal sensitivity on Gemini-2.5-Flash while Claude variants fall in [-3%, +7%]), and explicit conflict decomposition improves robustness under temporal drift (71.3%) and noisy distractors (69.9%) on Epi-Scale.","one_line_summary":"Context-Driven Decomposition (CDD) measures context compliance in RAG under knowledge conflicts and improves accuracy on adversarial benchmarks like TruthfulQA misconception injection and Epi-Scale tests across models.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the belief-decomposition probe at inference time accurately isolates the causal contribution of retrieved context to the final answer without the intervention itself altering the model's reasoning process or introducing new artifacts.","pith_extraction_headline":"Context-Driven Decomposition diagnoses when RAG follows conflicting retrieved context over its own knowledge."},"references":{"count":19,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":1985,"title":"Alchourr´on, Peter G¨ardenfors, and David Makinson","work_id":"ba7bde74-7e7c-4bd6-b899-3f5e1d135d3f","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"Self- RAG: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection","work_id":"2467a0c0-8651-49f7-94e4-8f143ca9b4e8","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Rich knowledge sources bring complex knowledge conflicts: Recalibrating models to reflect conflicting evidence","work_id":"675057be-d3f4-4562-ad25-2b88d3b6c880","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering","work_id":"a4f7d27c-407b-4895-a477-97ba6a515f1f","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2023,"title":"Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","work_id":"86ca07b8-4628-4f51-8938-a82683386ae4","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"2307.13702","is_internal_anchor":true}],"resolved_work":19,"snapshot_sha256":"56bd5a03e25001ddaa9a24f93afc2ee242ae59509dda9cd36c8ee0b8c45a40b7","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"264bbe3d-6d85-4a42-b3f5-03adc301c56e"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"sUKCznbPncnEsOYsl2GdxGC8FXE3Iyu1nwZyKSQf3n5YAZHqOnfRwRbkOyPhavcgn+imodqLRStKgEyHOtlPCg==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-27T18:38:33.734149Z"},"content_sha256":"14311c3480c3b6578a7d400a48692cbf9ea112f9416f819890a178f7bfef45ca","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:14311c3480c3b6578a7d400a48692cbf9ea112f9416f819890a178f7bfef45ca"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-27T18:38:33Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:77ND325OGD6ZCNV464EIHG64HJ","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"f138f6f9a4eba5851f243efa10d55fa3aa4529f52b58a3d9414ee2cf1929cbf5","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","title_canon_sha256":"6c9c81e9d35063e4c00451fd0995231e84743f587ecef3eb40743ad8e0c02b20"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.14473","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14473","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14473v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14473","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"77ND325OGD6Z","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"77ND325OGD6ZCNV4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"77ND325O","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:14311c3480c3b6578a7d400a48692cbf9ea112f9416f819890a178f7bfef45ca","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"CDD exposes three patterns: context compliance is measurable in adversarial settings (Standard RAG reaches 15.0% accuracy on TruthfulQA misconception injection), adversarial accuracy gains transfer across model families but rationale-answer causal coupling does not (CDD reaches 64.1% mistake-injection causal sensitivity on Gemini-2.5-Flash while Claude variants fall in [-3%, +7%]), and explicit conflict decomposition improves robustness under temporal drift (71.3%) and noisy distractors (69.9%) on Epi-Scale."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the belief-decomposition probe at inference time accurately isolates the causal contribution of retrieved context to the final answer without the intervention itself altering the model's reasoning process or introducing new artifacts."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Context-Driven Decomposition (CDD) measures context compliance in RAG under knowledge conflicts and improves accuracy on adversarial benchmarks like TruthfulQA misconception injection and Epi-Scale tests across models."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Context-Driven Decomposition diagnoses when RAG follows conflicting retrieved context over its own knowledge."}],"snapshot_sha256":"1bfc07b2bbd7203a708b38a5ba098d4e5d07c4c7ef41db395d12ae09dbe7e1ec"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"The Context-Compliance Regime in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) occurs when retrieved context dominates\n  the final answer even when it conflicts with the model's parametric knowledge. Accuracy alone does not reveal\n  how retrieved context causally shapes answers under such conflict. We introduce Context-Driven Decomposition\n  (CDD), a belief-decomposition probe that operates at inference time and serves as an intervention mechanism for\n  controlled retrieval conflict. Across Epi-Scale stress tests, TruthfulQA misconception injection, and cross-\n  model reruns, CDD exposes three patterns","authors_text":"Huan Xu, Pin Qian, Shuhuai Lin, Sipeng Zhang, Su Wang, Xinpeng Wei, Yihang Chen","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"headline":"Context-Driven Decomposition diagnoses when RAG follows conflicting retrieved context over its own knowledge.","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","title":"Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict"},"references":{"count":19,"internal_anchors":2,"resolved_work":19,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Alchourr´on, Peter G¨ardenfors, and David Makinson","work_id":"ba7bde74-7e7c-4bd6-b899-3f5e1d135d3f","year":1985},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Self- RAG: Learning to retrieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection","work_id":"2467a0c0-8651-49f7-94e4-8f143ca9b4e8","year":2024},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Rich knowledge sources bring complex knowledge conflicts: Recalibrating models to reflect conflicting evidence","work_id":"675057be-d3f4-4562-ad25-2b88d3b6c880","year":2022},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering","work_id":"a4f7d27c-407b-4895-a477-97ba6a515f1f","year":2020},{"cited_arxiv_id":"2307.13702","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":5,"title":"Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","work_id":"86ca07b8-4628-4f51-8938-a82683386ae4","year":2023}],"snapshot_sha256":"56bd5a03e25001ddaa9a24f93afc2ee242ae59509dda9cd36c8ee0b8c45a40b7"},"source":{"id":"2605.14473","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-15T01:59:46.144779Z","id":"264bbe3d-6d85-4a42-b3f5-03adc301c56e","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Context-Driven Decomposition (CDD) measures context compliance in RAG under knowledge conflicts and improves accuracy on adversarial benchmarks like TruthfulQA misconception injection and Epi-Scale tests across models.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Context-Driven Decomposition diagnoses when RAG follows conflicting retrieved context over its own knowledge.","strongest_claim":"CDD exposes three patterns: context compliance is measurable in adversarial settings (Standard RAG reaches 15.0% accuracy on TruthfulQA misconception injection), adversarial accuracy gains transfer across model families but rationale-answer causal coupling does not (CDD reaches 64.1% mistake-injection causal sensitivity on Gemini-2.5-Flash while Claude variants fall in [-3%, +7%]), and explicit conflict decomposition improves robustness under temporal drift (71.3%) and noisy distractors (69.9%) on Epi-Scale.","weakest_assumption":"That the belief-decomposition probe at inference time accurately isolates the causal contribution of retrieved context to the final answer without the intervention itself altering the model's reasoning process or introducing new artifacts."}},"verdict_id":"264bbe3d-6d85-4a42-b3f5-03adc301c56e"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:3876cfa0c6789c4345774a6ebdc028a0de63d6433c1f9770ce3167fc19e61214","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"f138f6f9a4eba5851f243efa10d55fa3aa4529f52b58a3d9414ee2cf1929cbf5","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T07:14:19Z","title_canon_sha256":"6c9c81e9d35063e4c00451fd0995231e84743f587ecef3eb40743ad8e0c02b20"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.14473","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"ffda3debae30fd9136bcf708839bdc3a57a67a6b425ab93b4fe277051de3c3d8","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"ffda3debae30fd9136bcf708839bdc3a57a67a6b425ab93b4fe277051de3c3d8","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06.636181Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06.636181Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"MSEgfYTuR28mDbVQEAkJMGh3n6JhL61BjYUz2rWFXHbGZpjcHQ78SCl4s2vgaxws++YRoEPrtKeHGg6kKhPyBw==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:06.636964Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.14473","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:3876cfa0c6789c4345774a6ebdc028a0de63d6433c1f9770ce3167fc19e61214","sha256:14311c3480c3b6578a7d400a48692cbf9ea112f9416f819890a178f7bfef45ca"],"state_sha256":"6c72fdfd5ce620304e893b2e028086ff6421fa7c22ed801d926ca4dd32c26ef1"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"NZ5RnbIcHF9ojnMg4IQoXel0on4AzW0l1noZBvzZdL1EMmE7P1LMxo2fOcVQIHiTSKdUglwWMG5NrU6+DvsADw==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-27T18:38:33.737355Z","bundle_sha256":"a4da0e8f33601dd5fb24ad5c3d3d56a48b882d28faf0584be822068ca9465e1b"}}