{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL","short_pith_number":"pith:7BREELHC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f862422ce26cda727ee29a9bf445d90ad597fe7a6b4e2f9e758002061dae6013","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.13580","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"EFX Exists for Three Types of Agents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DS","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Nithin Varma, Prajakta Nimbhorkar, Pratik Ghosal, Vishwa Prakash HV","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T14:15:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the problem of finding an envy-free allocation of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. We focus on the fairness notion of envy-freeness up to any good (EFX). A central open question in fair division is whether EFX allocations always exist for any number of agents. While EFX has been established for three agents [CGM24] and for any number of agents with at most two distinct valuations [Mah23], its existence in more general settings remains open.\n  In this paper, we make significant progress by proving that EFX allocations exist for any number of agents when there ar"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.13580","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T14:15:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DS","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"a1c63776319a946b43b3626886ef85800b96ffe5861f2efe116480cfe16b2f90","abstract_canon_sha256":"d316d84b9f109c6414534488da5f25578966ec091fcb6f402074c5213b46bb93"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.777078Z","signature_b64":"OwEa6xc/LgSEkugJ115aXG3s+usZLHSau+mq1xqb6WqfN10zghCPJ0F+OtU4R6N6FFg7L+orE+MrIUxYjliBBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f862422ce26cda727ee29a9bf445d90ad597fe7a6b4e2f9e758002061dae6013","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776531Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776531Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"EFX Exists for Three Types of Agents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DS","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Nithin Varma, Prajakta Nimbhorkar, Pratik Ghosal, Vishwa Prakash HV","submitted_at":"2024-10-17T14:15:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study the problem of finding an envy-free allocation of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. We focus on the fairness notion of envy-freeness up to any good (EFX). A central open question in fair division is whether EFX allocations always exist for any number of agents. While EFX has been established for three agents [CGM24] and for any number of agents with at most two distinct valuations [Mah23], its existence in more general settings remains open.\n  In this paper, we make significant progress by proving that EFX allocations exist for any number of agents when there ar"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.13580","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.13580/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.13580","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.13580v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.13580","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7BREELHCNTNH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7BREELHCNTNHE7XC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7BREELHC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09600","citing_title":"On the existence of EFX allocations for goods","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7BREELHC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7BREELHC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.13580&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7BREELHCNTNHE7XCTKN7IROZBL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:01.776605+00:00"}