{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1997:7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B","short_pith_number":"pith:7CIRLULF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f89115d165a54482dd8271f3ae92a6d04500e9f976639620bf05166e0b92acca","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"astro-ph/9707187","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evidence for substructure in lens galaxies?","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph","authors_text":"Peter Schneider (MPA), Shude Mao","submitted_at":"1997-07-16T15:31:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We discuss whether one should expect that multiply imaged QSOs can be understood with `simple' lens models which contain a handful of parameters. Whereas for many lens systems such simple mass models yield a remarkably good description of the observed properties, there are some systems which are notoriously difficult to understand quantitatively. We argue that at least in one case (B 1422+231) these difficulties are not due to a `wrong' parametrization of the lens model, but that the discrepancy between observed and model-predicted flux ratios are due to substructure in the lens. Similar to mi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"astro-ph/9707187","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"astro-ph","submitted_at":"1997-07-16T15:31:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c89505939b5fec542be942dffea764fce41377433c2f2381dc370cded8adc3b4","abstract_canon_sha256":"d988a2c5efe2f3b57c90ff5ed2ee0b65ca4ef9ceb30f737e40c4e9436040ae47"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.744144Z","signature_b64":"AOv/57iu1lCslRIFVbpHBAb2CPGM9DX3ax6dvTUTEDLyJiiCvw4643jlAGA9qhJBxM/ZtweWby0qKaBOPflMDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f89115d165a54482dd8271f3ae92a6d04500e9f976639620bf05166e0b92acca","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743773Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743773Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evidence for substructure in lens galaxies?","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph","authors_text":"Peter Schneider (MPA), Shude Mao","submitted_at":"1997-07-16T15:31:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We discuss whether one should expect that multiply imaged QSOs can be understood with `simple' lens models which contain a handful of parameters. Whereas for many lens systems such simple mass models yield a remarkably good description of the observed properties, there are some systems which are notoriously difficult to understand quantitatively. We argue that at least in one case (B 1422+231) these difficulties are not due to a `wrong' parametrization of the lens model, but that the discrepancy between observed and model-predicted flux ratios are due to substructure in the lens. Similar to mi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"astro-ph/9707187","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/astro-ph/9707187/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"astro-ph/9707187","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"astro-ph/9707187v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9707187","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7CIRLULFUVCI","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7CIRLULFUVCIFXMC","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7CIRLULF","created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21519","citing_title":"Wave-optics imprints of dark matter subhalos on strongly lensed gravitational waves. II. Saddle images and detectability","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.16971","citing_title":"Probing Dark Matter Substructure with Image Number Anomaly in Strong Lensing Systems","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7CIRLULF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7CIRLULF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=astro-ph/9707187&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7CIRLULFUVCIFXMCOHZ25EVG2B/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T16:03:07.743838+00:00"}