{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2006:7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5","short_pith_number":"pith:7DCJZY4J","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f8c49ce389377531687b5c795a60bfb77be26e41ef69c9432a9b31a2dab7908f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/0612146","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hawking-Moss bounces and vacuum decay rates","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Erick J. Weinberg","submitted_at":"2006-12-14T10:01:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"The conventional interpretation of the Hawking-Moss (HM) solution implies a transition rate between vacua that depends only on the values of the potential in the initial vacuum and at the top of a potential barrier, leading to the implausible conclusion that transitions to distant vacua can be as likely as those to a nearby one. I analyze this issue using a nongravitational example with analogous properties. I show that such HM bounce do not give reliable rate calculations, but are instead related to the probability of finding a quasistable configuration at a local potential maximum."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/0612146","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2006-12-14T10:01:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"9a0ff5fb993573c2208deb09f363ff6d4b226a027a3fa693acb0927a97e10b72","abstract_canon_sha256":"de8b4465e02d807750c10861df2ba8d08191931d1a36fee149d9d33513650089"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623904Z","signature_b64":"anvxcwQLw0voBlEczNjKwo/Ys06rGF6TI3/vDQjRdbE5aB2+UtXUKca0qjePudJMNQEjTlNGIJF03lMtIrxMCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f8c49ce389377531687b5c795a60bfb77be26e41ef69c9432a9b31a2dab7908f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623549Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623549Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hawking-Moss bounces and vacuum decay rates","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Erick J. Weinberg","submitted_at":"2006-12-14T10:01:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"The conventional interpretation of the Hawking-Moss (HM) solution implies a transition rate between vacua that depends only on the values of the potential in the initial vacuum and at the top of a potential barrier, leading to the implausible conclusion that transitions to distant vacua can be as likely as those to a nearby one. I analyze this issue using a nongravitational example with analogous properties. I show that such HM bounce do not give reliable rate calculations, but are instead related to the probability of finding a quasistable configuration at a local potential maximum."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/0612146","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-th/0612146/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/0612146","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/0612146v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0612146","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7DCJZY4JG52T","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7DCJZY4J","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03015","citing_title":"The Fate of Nucleated Black Holes in de Sitter Quantum Gravity","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03758","citing_title":"Dark Matter Production from Bubble Collisions during a First-Order Phase Transition at the End of Inflation","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03015","citing_title":"The Fate of Nucleated Black Holes in de Sitter Quantum Gravity","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7DCJZY4J"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7DCJZY4J","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/0612146&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7DCJZY4JG52TC2D3LR4VUYF7W5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:18:54.623613+00:00"}