{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN","short_pith_number":"pith:7DFFP4ZJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f8ca57f32938509b1f3d6181edbaa60b4033e7f359e612cba9cb668fff629ab1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2012.06137","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Saving superconducting quantum processors from qubit decay and correlated errors generated by gamma and cosmic rays","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.supr-con"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"John M. Martinis","submitted_at":"2020-12-11T05:44:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Error-corrected quantum computers can only work if errors are small and uncorrelated. Here I show how cosmic rays or stray background radiation affects superconducting qubits by modeling the phonon to electron/quasiparticle down-conversion physics. For present designs, the model predicts about 57\\% of the radiation energy breaks Cooper pairs into quasiparticles, which then vigorously suppress the qubit energy relaxation time ($T_1 \\sim$ 160 ns) over a large area (cm) and for a long time (ms). Such large and correlated decay kills error correction. Using this quantitative model, I show how this"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2012.06137","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2020-12-11T05:44:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cond-mat.supr-con"],"title_canon_sha256":"a5a1bc3d63591f6ca6bfbbc3bdea38b62049906b5b081e2e201e2fdcea243f0e","abstract_canon_sha256":"9be42a61f1d6c686ccf5a7bfdcbcf0dd2fce33510ab4bc4edde0128407c56449"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.257370Z","signature_b64":"Ev8E2+DpVAYN3JQzLIOOQrTdrm5kHwaTHptZu1YzcrBrGETDbULF0QBIkRPDHAc6qEhsJ3rN+1mfPg86y4m7Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f8ca57f32938509b1f3d6181edbaa60b4033e7f359e612cba9cb668fff629ab1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256919Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256919Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Saving superconducting quantum processors from qubit decay and correlated errors generated by gamma and cosmic rays","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.supr-con"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"John M. Martinis","submitted_at":"2020-12-11T05:44:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Error-corrected quantum computers can only work if errors are small and uncorrelated. Here I show how cosmic rays or stray background radiation affects superconducting qubits by modeling the phonon to electron/quasiparticle down-conversion physics. For present designs, the model predicts about 57\\% of the radiation energy breaks Cooper pairs into quasiparticles, which then vigorously suppress the qubit energy relaxation time ($T_1 \\sim$ 160 ns) over a large area (cm) and for a long time (ms). Such large and correlated decay kills error correction. Using this quantitative model, I show how this"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2012.06137","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2012.06137/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2012.06137","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2012.06137v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2012.06137","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7DFFP4ZJHBIJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7DFFP4ZJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13176","citing_title":"Measuring quasiparticle dynamics for particle impact reconstruction in a superconducting qubit chip","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7DFFP4ZJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7DFFP4ZJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2012.06137&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7DFFP4ZJHBIJWHZ5MGA63OVGBN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:29:11.256991+00:00"}