{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM","short_pith_number":"pith:7DQ5VASY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f8e1da825873f69f4fd1e04d315888c33817d6dcc868d74fd3c2e02e4c1f920f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.02727","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Functional trustworthiness of AI systems by statistically valid testing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Bernhard Nessler, Sepp Hochreiter, Thomas Doms","submitted_at":"2023-10-04T11:07:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"The authors are concerned about the safety, health, and rights of the European citizens due to inadequate measures and procedures required by the current draft of the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act for the conformity assessment of AI systems. We observe that not only the current draft of the EU AI Act, but also the accompanying standardization efforts in CEN/CENELEC, have resorted to the position that real functional guarantees of AI systems supposedly would be unrealistic and too complex anyways. Yet enacting a conformity assessment procedure that creates the false illusion of trust in i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.02727","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2023-10-04T11:07:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"bcb2378f6598ed1575aba2030892155921ec9a1911c677418fc95b4e780df80c","abstract_canon_sha256":"ca3a06a805497a93481edaf537d2b8c881492a205a684fd01738734f86c8de9e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094661Z","signature_b64":"zqo7jcki/PFXB1YO4F3Z31kxws31qBiuv2iax81RQ+/zciHrEEpAOCjXlMDfAaEl9hpyDfguBDWGWU+bvwH5Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f8e1da825873f69f4fd1e04d315888c33817d6dcc868d74fd3c2e02e4c1f920f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094281Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094281Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Functional trustworthiness of AI systems by statistically valid testing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Bernhard Nessler, Sepp Hochreiter, Thomas Doms","submitted_at":"2023-10-04T11:07:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"The authors are concerned about the safety, health, and rights of the European citizens due to inadequate measures and procedures required by the current draft of the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act for the conformity assessment of AI systems. We observe that not only the current draft of the EU AI Act, but also the accompanying standardization efforts in CEN/CENELEC, have resorted to the position that real functional guarantees of AI systems supposedly would be unrealistic and too complex anyways. Yet enacting a conformity assessment procedure that creates the false illusion of trust in i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.02727","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.02727/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.02727","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.02727v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.02727","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7DQ5VASYOP3J","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7DQ5VASY","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.08852","citing_title":"Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7DQ5VASY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7DQ5VASY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.02727&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7DQ5VASYOP3J6T6R4BGTCWEIYM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:13.094347+00:00"}