{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU","short_pith_number":"pith:7E4CIWIU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f938245914cce8966aab2fb46ea3280d1dbf590af3c844feb126be29fdd640ca","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.14424","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Automating psychological hypothesis generation with AI: when large language models meet causal graph","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Kai Mao, Kaiping Peng, Song Tong, Yukun Zhao, Zhen Huang","submitted_at":"2024-02-22T10:12:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Leveraging the synergy between causal knowledge graphs and a large language model (LLM), our study introduces a groundbreaking approach for computational hypothesis generation in psychology. We analyzed 43,312 psychology articles using a LLM to extract causal relation pairs. This analysis produced a specialized causal graph for psychology. Applying link prediction algorithms, we generated 130 potential psychological hypotheses focusing on `well-being', then compared them against research ideas conceived by doctoral scholars and those produced solely by the LLM. Interestingly, our combined appr"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.14424","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-02-22T10:12:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"f5716e87df3ee6d56d6170a7d9050b1c231aa1fdfe7d7cc5eeef31fd6e71fac9","abstract_canon_sha256":"f8b3e25ae6a25b29696689c498b40e8fad7e0bf4b54adfa880b2bd853c9db0d5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531463Z","signature_b64":"qW1pMMV4NtH03+gSyKHA8eMv7az5F6Xurjog0lcQMcGf/SEtesMdwEu6YHpJvLsXvRzCLhFOOjTGcTlt37/nAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f938245914cce8966aab2fb46ea3280d1dbf590af3c844feb126be29fdd640ca","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531062Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531062Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Automating psychological hypothesis generation with AI: when large language models meet causal graph","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Kai Mao, Kaiping Peng, Song Tong, Yukun Zhao, Zhen Huang","submitted_at":"2024-02-22T10:12:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Leveraging the synergy between causal knowledge graphs and a large language model (LLM), our study introduces a groundbreaking approach for computational hypothesis generation in psychology. We analyzed 43,312 psychology articles using a LLM to extract causal relation pairs. This analysis produced a specialized causal graph for psychology. Applying link prediction algorithms, we generated 130 potential psychological hypotheses focusing on `well-being', then compared them against research ideas conceived by doctoral scholars and those produced solely by the LLM. Interestingly, our combined appr"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.14424","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.14424/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.14424","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.14424v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.14424","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7E4CIWIUZTUJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VL","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7E4CIWIU","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.00844","citing_title":"LLM Cannot Discover Causality, and Should Be Restricted to Non-Decisional Support in Causal Discovery","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7E4CIWIU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7E4CIWIU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.14424&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7E4CIWIUZTUJM2VLF62G5IZIBU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:56:03.531114+00:00"}