{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5","short_pith_number":"pith:7FZJ4KWT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f9729e2ad30832d435c0fca71b6c1d2f5a514b1108f67a510191cb5171be3d0f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1107.1883","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantification in ordinary language","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Christian Retor\\'e (LaBRI, INRIA Bordeaux - Sud-Ouest), Michele Abrusci","submitted_at":"2011-07-10T19:20:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"We firstly show that the standard interpretation of natural quantification in mathematical logic does not provide a satisfying account of its original richness. In particular, it ignores the difference between generic and distributive readings. We claim that it is due to the use of a set theoretical framework. We therefore propose a proof theoretical treatment in terms of proofs and refutations. Thereafter we apply these ideas to quantifiers that are not first order definable like \"the majority of\"."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1107.1883","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2011-07-10T19:20:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3eefef27e691695f7722dc05d7996b9085b790b1ec1eda1451eaaee8c54b8429","abstract_canon_sha256":"4564947721b6add43ce9fe6406f7ba0c18eb0a5dcfd096b6b1378bf600184411"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960892Z","signature_b64":"lECZxR4QS1GiMuxPbPMViTOJjhKjreNpdedrnEatIQH4cHyd1ewohuG77nzECGXpCZbPoG5igkfTlZmTp0iNCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f9729e2ad30832d435c0fca71b6c1d2f5a514b1108f67a510191cb5171be3d0f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960229Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960229Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantification in ordinary language","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Christian Retor\\'e (LaBRI, INRIA Bordeaux - Sud-Ouest), Michele Abrusci","submitted_at":"2011-07-10T19:20:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"We firstly show that the standard interpretation of natural quantification in mathematical logic does not provide a satisfying account of its original richness. In particular, it ignores the difference between generic and distributive readings. We claim that it is due to the use of a set theoretical framework. We therefore propose a proof theoretical treatment in terms of proofs and refutations. Thereafter we apply these ideas to quantifiers that are not first order definable like \"the majority of\"."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1107.1883","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1107.1883","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1107.1883v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1107.1883","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7FZJ4KWTBAZN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:22.705136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:22.705136+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7FZJ4KWT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:22.705136+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7FZJ4KWT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7FZJ4KWT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1107.1883&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7FZJ4KWTBAZNINOA7STRW3A5F5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960300+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:18:33.960300+00:00"}