{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI","short_pith_number":"pith:7GU6UJY3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f9a9ea271b48bc503533af5b2229f26a2125b0133029207a1467588ff29d82e7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.18489","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LLM4EFFI: Leveraging Large Language Models to Enhance Code Efficiency and Correctness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Jianwei Yin, Peiyu Liu, Tengfei Ma, Tong Ye, Weigang Huang, Wenhai Wang, Xuhong Zhang","submitted_at":"2025-02-17T07:01:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly Code LLMs, have demonstrated impressive performance in code generation. Current research primarily focuses on the correctness of generated code, while efficiency remains less explored. Recent works have focused on modifying the initial version of the code to improve its efficiency. However, such refinements are limited by the algorithmic design and overall logic of the initial code, resulting in only incremental improvements. In contrast, when human developers write high-quality code, they typically begin by designing several potential solutions at th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.18489","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-02-17T07:01:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"025cc942bda0077993a3c0f4e6a209fac878388f731f75d6250dabe02839943b","abstract_canon_sha256":"7fcf61c7cb81fa5e1b1009a8c2ee03cda0f1eaddbdac9279fa9e2cf7e5d350c1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.745305Z","signature_b64":"l3SJJHuKP9cu4shXT5E0ObokoWPQyBJI5FbbHl287yvdk1VECm7uj8t6JcSDILM7M8RN5iI4Hah9fqycgcI+Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f9a9ea271b48bc503533af5b2229f26a2125b0133029207a1467588ff29d82e7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744725Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744725Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LLM4EFFI: Leveraging Large Language Models to Enhance Code Efficiency and Correctness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Jianwei Yin, Peiyu Liu, Tengfei Ma, Tong Ye, Weigang Huang, Wenhai Wang, Xuhong Zhang","submitted_at":"2025-02-17T07:01:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly Code LLMs, have demonstrated impressive performance in code generation. Current research primarily focuses on the correctness of generated code, while efficiency remains less explored. Recent works have focused on modifying the initial version of the code to improve its efficiency. However, such refinements are limited by the algorithmic design and overall logic of the initial code, resulting in only incremental improvements. In contrast, when human developers write high-quality code, they typically begin by designing several potential solutions at th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.18489","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.18489/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.18489","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.18489v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.18489","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7GU6UJY3JC6F","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7GU6UJY3JC6FANJT","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7GU6UJY3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07619","citing_title":"Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMs","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06826","citing_title":"SkelDPO: A Skeleton-Guided Direct Preference Optimization Framework for Efficient Code Generation","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06821","citing_title":"Chiseling Out Efficiency: Structured Skeleton Supervision for Efficient Code Generation","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00708","citing_title":"MOSAIC: Modular Orchestration for Structured Agentic Intelligence and Composition","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.13766","citing_title":"A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standards","ref_index":138,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7GU6UJY3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7GU6UJY3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.18489&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7GU6UJY3JC6FANJTV5NSEKPSNI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:19:58.744802+00:00"}