{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ","short_pith_number":"pith:7H7MHFAW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f9fec39416f264a98b3bcf6deb1121a656444caeea0e92980b3550b42006d755","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.01766","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision Making","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.LG","econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Carina I. Hausladen, Damian Dailisan, Dirk Helbing, Joshua C. Yang, Marcin Korecki","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T14:52:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the voting behaviors of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4 and LLaMA-2, their biases, and how they align with human voting patterns. Our methodology involved using a dataset from a human voting experiment to establish a baseline for human preferences and conducting a corresponding experiment with LLM agents. We observed that the choice of voting methods and the presentation order influenced LLM voting outcomes. We found that varying the persona can reduce some of these biases and enhance alignment with human choices. While the Chain-of-Thought approach did"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.01766","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T14:52:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.LG","econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"942ebf2f46281de6fee7c676a3b23159e7e5a7bfc74d76b7d4d3bd7d0e8dcd50","abstract_canon_sha256":"d161b07838724469c8fa789b050ac17bc25c1faa354fe9dc40fe0f2af10b619b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774548Z","signature_b64":"yjMcMBWndJu2aAJnsmI5EJtVIEL2hElP2xTFMAqyTWoDShaWgc8BuMGsbOZa8Nl+FI1fUpNVnGvWDHwhbOoYAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f9fec39416f264a98b3bcf6deb1121a656444caeea0e92980b3550b42006d755","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.773960Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.773960Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision Making","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY","cs.LG","econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Carina I. Hausladen, Damian Dailisan, Dirk Helbing, Joshua C. Yang, Marcin Korecki","submitted_at":"2024-01-31T14:52:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper investigates the voting behaviors of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4 and LLaMA-2, their biases, and how they align with human voting patterns. Our methodology involved using a dataset from a human voting experiment to establish a baseline for human preferences and conducting a corresponding experiment with LLM agents. We observed that the choice of voting methods and the presentation order influenced LLM voting outcomes. We found that varying the persona can reduce some of these biases and enhance alignment with human choices. While the Chain-of-Thought approach did"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.01766","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.01766/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.01766","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.01766v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.01766","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7H7MHFAW6JSK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7H7MHFAW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.15815","citing_title":"LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacra","ref_index":71,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7H7MHFAW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7H7MHFAW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.01766&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7H7MHFAW6JSKTCZ3Z5W6WEJBUZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:51:30.774042+00:00"}