{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L","short_pith_number":"pith:7HQ2TJD5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f9e1a9a47d615eae45d77276776391fae7c95f95c3cf6e97779430de008f2613","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.18621","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conservation Laws For Every Quantum Measurement Outcome","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Daniel Collins, Sandu Popescu","submitted_at":"2024-04-29T11:42:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the paradigmatic example of quantum measurements, whenever one measures a system which starts in a superposition of two states of a conserved quantity, it jumps to one of the two states, implying different final values for the quantity that should have been conserved. The standard law of conservation for quantum mechanics handles this jump by stating only that the total distribution of the conserved quantity over repeated measurements is unchanged, but states nothing about individual cases. Here however we show that one can go beyond this and have conservation in each individual instance. W"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.18621","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2024-04-29T11:42:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"7d205981cfa11bee1ef5b3f40bfde93dadf0cd6628252813b0805f80e9686455","abstract_canon_sha256":"1f67081233efcf43267ed9622c45ad324befe271ae288f9defa45246a8f2a854"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.556372Z","signature_b64":"nuvnfNtKo6ixpZ4j3jifMXHHuVHXkAjK9x7QPqH7bY7Q11QmWUOUxtAkDtiKVjMb7bKIQ4mBAbOEqvJbAaDFBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f9e1a9a47d615eae45d77276776391fae7c95f95c3cf6e97779430de008f2613","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555903Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555903Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conservation Laws For Every Quantum Measurement Outcome","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Daniel Collins, Sandu Popescu","submitted_at":"2024-04-29T11:42:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the paradigmatic example of quantum measurements, whenever one measures a system which starts in a superposition of two states of a conserved quantity, it jumps to one of the two states, implying different final values for the quantity that should have been conserved. The standard law of conservation for quantum mechanics handles this jump by stating only that the total distribution of the conserved quantity over repeated measurements is unchanged, but states nothing about individual cases. Here however we show that one can go beyond this and have conservation in each individual instance. W"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.18621","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.18621/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.18621","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.18621v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.18621","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7HQ2TJD5MFPK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7HQ2TJD5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.09669","citing_title":"Observation as Physication. A single-world unitary no-conspiracy interpretation of quantum mechanics","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7HQ2TJD5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7HQ2TJD5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.18621&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7HQ2TJD5MFPK4ROXOJ3HOY4R7L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:44:39.555960+00:00"}