{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK","short_pith_number":"pith:7HTDSRRX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f9e6394637215568c0da24a6654890728ff6c17ba981e48acd333b04057431c9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1302.5177","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Reid Chandler, Todd Davies","submitted_at":"2013-02-21T04:33:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"This chapter reviews empirical evidence bearing on the design of online forums for deliberative civic engagement. Dimensions of design are defined for different aspects of the deliberation: its purpose, the target population, the spatiotemporal distance separating participants, the communication medium, and the deliberative process to be followed. After a brief overview of criteria for evaluating different design options, empirical findings are organized around design choices. Research has evolved away from treating technology for online deliberation dichotomously (either present or not) towar"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1302.5177","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2013-02-21T04:33:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"d80d2ec53803e67b2877dcebfcf87f8404dddf88330299d0afd5fedf2a697150","abstract_canon_sha256":"af2686fa13495c97fb84eb13943215aaf671c9a6e839c52c20f403fda7a959d5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419925Z","signature_b64":"SqQh9VWC6R9I4KLojf33DnS/uN8uDonI+3DoZsksGAzqmEFhMrd/zrIu6C63OfoyiyJTXpAyyZENVfcODx66Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f9e6394637215568c0da24a6654890728ff6c17ba981e48acd333b04057431c9","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419010Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419010Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Reid Chandler, Todd Davies","submitted_at":"2013-02-21T04:33:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"This chapter reviews empirical evidence bearing on the design of online forums for deliberative civic engagement. Dimensions of design are defined for different aspects of the deliberation: its purpose, the target population, the spatiotemporal distance separating participants, the communication medium, and the deliberative process to be followed. After a brief overview of criteria for evaluating different design options, empirical findings are organized around design choices. Research has evolved away from treating technology for online deliberation dichotomously (either present or not) towar"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1302.5177","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1302.5177","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419161+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1302.5177v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419161+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1302.5177","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419161+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7HTDSRRXEFKW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:36.564083+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:36.564083+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7HTDSRRX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:36.564083+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.03862","citing_title":"Enhancing Deliberativeness: Evaluating the Impact of Multimodal Reflection Nudges","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7HTDSRRX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7HTDSRRX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1302.5177&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7HTDSRRXEFKWRQG2ESTGKSEQOK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419161+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:32:59.419161+00:00"}