{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V","short_pith_number":"pith:7HVISZFT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"f9ea8964b348fdadc8dd4285653155ed7c25757a9a293cc9b19bd7b516c8f18d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.20506","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Common envelopes in massive stars III. The obstructive role of radiation transport in envelope ejection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.HE"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"Daniel J. Price, Ilya Mandel, Matthew R. Bate, Mike Y. M. Lau, Ryosuke Hirai","submitted_at":"2025-03-26T12:46:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present 3D radiation hydrodynamics simulations of common-envelope (CE) evolution involving a 12 solar mass red supergiant donor and a 3 solar mass companion. Existing 3D simulations are predominantly adiabatic, focusing strongly on low-mass donors on the red giant and asymptotic giant branches. However, the adiabatic assumption breaks down once the perturbed CE material becomes optically thin or when entering a longer-timescale evolutionary phase after the dynamical plunge-in. This is especially important for high-mass red supergiant donors, which have short thermal timescales, adding signi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.20506","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","submitted_at":"2025-03-26T12:46:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.HE"],"title_canon_sha256":"7df16fd75267a2a52e3b1840509afa191cb7438aaaa64bbeb5be90c07fe81f19","abstract_canon_sha256":"6c30964104035d5190beab24944913e73b9d56914dbde07f4c51b9e269c50da0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.437076Z","signature_b64":"qZQDeHUDuLSpvDqR3H2aQPQnnS37uY/vsgi0RcYVKIEKnTjuXh/YwCM+Avyzqxc2JBygImHGSA6q+2kUjRDxAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"f9ea8964b348fdadc8dd4285653155ed7c25757a9a293cc9b19bd7b516c8f18d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436573Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436573Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Common envelopes in massive stars III. The obstructive role of radiation transport in envelope ejection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.HE"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"Daniel J. Price, Ilya Mandel, Matthew R. Bate, Mike Y. M. Lau, Ryosuke Hirai","submitted_at":"2025-03-26T12:46:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present 3D radiation hydrodynamics simulations of common-envelope (CE) evolution involving a 12 solar mass red supergiant donor and a 3 solar mass companion. Existing 3D simulations are predominantly adiabatic, focusing strongly on low-mass donors on the red giant and asymptotic giant branches. However, the adiabatic assumption breaks down once the perturbed CE material becomes optically thin or when entering a longer-timescale evolutionary phase after the dynamical plunge-in. This is especially important for high-mass red supergiant donors, which have short thermal timescales, adding signi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.20506","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.20506/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.20506","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.20506v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.20506","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7HVISZFTJD62","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7HVISZFTJD623SG5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7HVISZFT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06333","citing_title":"The Best Guess: Testing new and old formalisms for the common envelope against observations","ref_index":92,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7HVISZFT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7HVISZFT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.20506&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7HVISZFTJD623SG5IKCWKMKV5V/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:41:22.436636+00:00"}