{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY","short_pith_number":"pith:7ILV56Z2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fa175efb3ad4edbc27e12637ddffaaae1eadcfa76b6f3e223c9f915d8ee402f9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.11073","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dominik Stammbach, Elliott Ash, Jingwei Ni, Markus Leippold, Minjing Shi, Mrinmaya Sachan","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T20:59:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the rise of generative AI, automated fact-checking methods to combat misinformation are becoming more and more important. However, factual claim detection, the first step in a fact-checking pipeline, suffers from two key issues that limit its scalability and generalizability: (1) inconsistency in definitions of the task and what a claim is, and (2) the high cost of manual annotation. To address (1), we review the definitions in related work and propose a unifying definition of factual claims that focuses on verifiability. To address (2), we introduce AFaCTA (Automatic Factual Claim deTect"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.11073","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T20:59:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"142b443c3062f177d47c77c4548d62f4b072813083093fb2814676dd4dff2f58","abstract_canon_sha256":"e501bcf5006fb72ddb0c43b53a2eced09d68e134a4ca8ee095ed8ceee51b1016"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796829Z","signature_b64":"bcd31m3GtRKKVbVF1/azAfwvA7361oiuFvqXjtWYUiTvpa6zW2jDaWEuH7+NnSKQl6YNrsNJwusGrNzQggPZAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fa175efb3ad4edbc27e12637ddffaaae1eadcfa76b6f3e223c9f915d8ee402f9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796329Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796329Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dominik Stammbach, Elliott Ash, Jingwei Ni, Markus Leippold, Minjing Shi, Mrinmaya Sachan","submitted_at":"2024-02-16T20:59:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the rise of generative AI, automated fact-checking methods to combat misinformation are becoming more and more important. However, factual claim detection, the first step in a fact-checking pipeline, suffers from two key issues that limit its scalability and generalizability: (1) inconsistency in definitions of the task and what a claim is, and (2) the high cost of manual annotation. To address (1), we review the definitions in related work and propose a unifying definition of factual claims that focuses on verifiability. To address (2), we introduce AFaCTA (Automatic Factual Claim deTect"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.11073","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.11073/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.11073","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.11073v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.11073","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7ILV56Z22TW3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7B","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7ILV56Z2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.07211","citing_title":"Sword and Shield: Uses and Strategies of LLMs in Navigating Disinformation","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7ILV56Z2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7ILV56Z2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.11073&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7ILV56Z22TW3YJ7BEY35375KVY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:26:19.796390+00:00"}