{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF","short_pith_number":"pith:7IX65F7F","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fa2fee97e55c4971f1bb5d3ffa75c131578b8391790979e20d8bcc612a462cfb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.16961","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A joint test of unconfoundedness and common trends","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Eva-Maria Oe{\\ss}, Martin Huber","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T18:19:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces an overidentification test of two alternative assumptions to identify the average treatment effect on the treated in a two-period panel data setting: unconfoundedness and common trends. Under the unconfoundedness assumption, treatment assignment and post-treatment outcomes are independent, conditional on control variables and pre-treatment outcomes, which motivates including pre-treatment outcomes in the set of controls. Conversely, under the common trends assumption, the trend and the treatment assignment are independent, conditional on control variables. This motivates "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.16961","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T18:19:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f733e587d4bd63f1c3b3c32c590f7160bd9262233bbffa723ec626a98d94457b","abstract_canon_sha256":"fefa3c1792433fe81114fb2c1f5bbe1e16a9d1a2581426e67bb7f7ca7a9eca4a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754690Z","signature_b64":"5ZJ5yhpT8St0pQqikOTQYRf45w4z6E3VFYJtId/ieLi20xuNfTzK+hnoQIqI8GutYQgImYoIliZfQ+kMt8iUAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fa2fee97e55c4971f1bb5d3ffa75c131578b8391790979e20d8bcc612a462cfb","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754216Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754216Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A joint test of unconfoundedness and common trends","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Eva-Maria Oe{\\ss}, Martin Huber","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T18:19:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces an overidentification test of two alternative assumptions to identify the average treatment effect on the treated in a two-period panel data setting: unconfoundedness and common trends. Under the unconfoundedness assumption, treatment assignment and post-treatment outcomes are independent, conditional on control variables and pre-treatment outcomes, which motivates including pre-treatment outcomes in the set of controls. Conversely, under the common trends assumption, the trend and the treatment assignment are independent, conditional on control variables. This motivates "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.16961","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.16961/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.16961","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.16961v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.16961","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7IX65F7FLREX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7IX65F7FLREXD4N3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7IX65F7F","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.02234","citing_title":"When Do Treatment Changes Identify Causal Effects?","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7IX65F7F"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7IX65F7F","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.16961&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7IX65F7FLREXD4N3LU77U5OBGF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:35:45.754278+00:00"}