{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE","short_pith_number":"pith:7JQIIVZO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fa6084572edf497ff035eb0d84b527310921126eb1ecf9192012ab4299c6e1ef","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.17383","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Which Questions Improve Learning the Most? Utility Estimation of Questions with LM-based Simulations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dong-Ho Lee, Hyundong Cho, Jay Pujara, Jonathan May","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T18:08:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Asking good questions is critical for comprehension and learning, yet evaluating and generating such questions remains a challenging problem. Prior work on inquisitive questions focuses on learner-generated, curiosity-driven queries and evaluates them using indirect metrics, such as salience or information gain, that do not directly capture a question's impact on actual learning outcomes. We introduce QUEST (Question Utility Estimation with Simulated Tests), a framework that uses language models to simulate learners and directly quantify the utility of a question - its contribution to exam per"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.17383","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T18:08:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e4ea82989914b77b2824d630ac9e749d41994d6df5d748087cb4c1447dfac12c","abstract_canon_sha256":"01f113639edbbb8ad891ea95d9554af8352f399c1d05e98932e41fdca02d3252"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957797Z","signature_b64":"mnCPgPML2Q+tTa1c5DuejhRsWhfnwTXi/lqqdDgE1V2xkncLi1U8hchmMOjvht6Oirurj+7ttHGO84iMa/3sCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fa6084572edf497ff035eb0d84b527310921126eb1ecf9192012ab4299c6e1ef","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957302Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957302Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Which Questions Improve Learning the Most? Utility Estimation of Questions with LM-based Simulations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dong-Ho Lee, Hyundong Cho, Jay Pujara, Jonathan May","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T18:08:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Asking good questions is critical for comprehension and learning, yet evaluating and generating such questions remains a challenging problem. Prior work on inquisitive questions focuses on learner-generated, curiosity-driven queries and evaluates them using indirect metrics, such as salience or information gain, that do not directly capture a question's impact on actual learning outcomes. We introduce QUEST (Question Utility Estimation with Simulated Tests), a framework that uses language models to simulate learners and directly quantify the utility of a question - its contribution to exam per"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.17383","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.17383/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.17383","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.17383v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17383","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7JQIIVZO35EX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7JQIIVZO35EX74BV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7JQIIVZO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.09173","citing_title":"The Curious Language Model: Strategic Test-Time Information Acquisition","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7JQIIVZO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7JQIIVZO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.17383&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7JQIIVZO35EX74BV5MGYJNJHGE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:49:50.957373+00:00"}