{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV","short_pith_number":"pith:7K2GML77","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fab4662ffffb2da8e9b48b6c5fa72b3d724d8633a46e2d38ec9a222d3b57940a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2001.10965","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Maximum likelihood estimation and uncertainty quantification for Gaussian process approximation of deterministic functions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.NA","math.NA","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Chris J. Oates, Filip Tronarp, George Wynne, Simo S\\\"arkk\\\"a, Toni Karvonen","submitted_at":"2020-01-29T17:20:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the ubiquity of the Gaussian process regression model, few theoretical results are available that account for the fact that parameters of the covariance kernel typically need to be estimated from the dataset. This article provides one of the first theoretical analyses in the context of Gaussian process regression with a noiseless dataset. Specifically, we consider the scenario where the scale parameter of a Sobolev kernel (such as a Mat\\'{e}rn kernel) is estimated by maximum likelihood. We show that the maximum likelihood estimation of the scale parameter alone provides significant ada"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2001.10965","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2020-01-29T17:20:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.NA","math.NA","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"867f54df6cb1dd44b11c3630b188191d97495837d7e4f8774fa735abfb31d20f","abstract_canon_sha256":"fd70d0fb4c2efd140445b10ba9e2ed466fd60225e880bb95ed52e60226128e39"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.762189Z","signature_b64":"AYLt3CRcRY/xHv8MhrSb5pmIMOpCQ1eErQa22tXm5XzjsZrVBW25ncyxBL4F8g5/KgfjkbpT3JZuIw+SiNkcBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fab4662ffffb2da8e9b48b6c5fa72b3d724d8633a46e2d38ec9a222d3b57940a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761817Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761817Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Maximum likelihood estimation and uncertainty quantification for Gaussian process approximation of deterministic functions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.NA","math.NA","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Chris J. Oates, Filip Tronarp, George Wynne, Simo S\\\"arkk\\\"a, Toni Karvonen","submitted_at":"2020-01-29T17:20:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the ubiquity of the Gaussian process regression model, few theoretical results are available that account for the fact that parameters of the covariance kernel typically need to be estimated from the dataset. This article provides one of the first theoretical analyses in the context of Gaussian process regression with a noiseless dataset. Specifically, we consider the scenario where the scale parameter of a Sobolev kernel (such as a Mat\\'{e}rn kernel) is estimated by maximum likelihood. We show that the maximum likelihood estimation of the scale parameter alone provides significant ada"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2001.10965","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2001.10965/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2001.10965","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2001.10965v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2001.10965","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7K2GML777MW2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7K2GML777MW2R2NU","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7K2GML77","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.05995","citing_title":"A Unified Risk View of Uncertainty: Posterior Risk for Disentanglement and Evaluation Beyond Proxies","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7K2GML77"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7K2GML77","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2001.10965&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2GML777MW2R2NURNWF7JZLHV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:01:56.761874+00:00"}