{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV","short_pith_number":"pith:7K2VUCQT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fab55a0a135e5c6a204446f1b3c18c3d7006831daca3719e3454a71dc37224ec","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.17234","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amr Gomaa, Lea Sch\\\"onherr, Mario Fritz, Sahar Abdelnabi, Sarath Sivaprasad","submitted_at":"2023-09-29T13:33:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"There is an growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-agent systems to tackle interactive real-world tasks that require effective collaboration and assessing complex situations. Yet, we still have a limited understanding of LLMs' communication and decision-making abilities in multi-agent setups. The fundamental task of negotiation spans many key features of communication, such as cooperation, competition, and manipulation potentials. Thus, we propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate LLMs. We create a testbed of complex multi-agent, multi-issue, and semantically rich"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.17234","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-09-29T13:33:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"b1370b0eeb3f074111d8f114d2d3518f169541550b16ec906ef2082faf1b6a87","abstract_canon_sha256":"ddc56a9e7fc5f9f7f8e9acb44e984f522c3cba48322686ed7d4e3319bd50bd5a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.626168Z","signature_b64":"Rbnzx7FGiNSEie1mwg3ew6F6TvpQPjeXyFq7xJYsIExRzU+INgoam//W4f39Z216fJIh8fhoOg5kmnECmDPDAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fab55a0a135e5c6a204446f1b3c18c3d7006831daca3719e3454a71dc37224ec","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625661Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625661Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amr Gomaa, Lea Sch\\\"onherr, Mario Fritz, Sahar Abdelnabi, Sarath Sivaprasad","submitted_at":"2023-09-29T13:33:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"There is an growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-agent systems to tackle interactive real-world tasks that require effective collaboration and assessing complex situations. Yet, we still have a limited understanding of LLMs' communication and decision-making abilities in multi-agent setups. The fundamental task of negotiation spans many key features of communication, such as cooperation, competition, and manipulation potentials. Thus, we propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate LLMs. We create a testbed of complex multi-agent, multi-issue, and semantically rich"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.17234","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.17234/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.17234","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.17234v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.17234","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7K2VUCQTLZOG","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7K2VUCQTLZOGUICE","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7K2VUCQT","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08068","citing_title":"DICE: Entropy-Regularized Equilibrium Selection for Stable Multi-Agent LLM Coordination","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18890","citing_title":"Stop Drawing Scientific Claims from LLM Social Simulations Without Robustness Audits","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.14066","citing_title":"A Benchmark for Multi-Party Negotiation Games from Real Negotiation Data","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01750","citing_title":"Talk is Cheap, Communication is Hard: Dynamic Grounding Failures and Repair in Multi-Agent Negotiation","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7K2VUCQT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7K2VUCQT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.17234&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7K2VUCQTLZOGUICEI3Y3HQMMHV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:29:17.625730+00:00"}