{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437","short_pith_number":"pith:7KHZP4BI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fa8f97f028be00f569384aa9d470dcdfec0c663423d8d93ff6866e443cdc0fef","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.10540","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"EchoLeak: The First Real-World Zero-Click Prompt Injection Exploit in a Production LLM System","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Aditya Sanjay Gujral, Pavan Reddy","submitted_at":"2025-09-06T04:06:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model (LLM) assistants are increasingly integrated into enterprise workflows, raising new security concerns as they bridge internal and external data sources. This paper presents an in-depth case study of EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711), a zero-click prompt injection vulnerability in Microsoft 365 Copilot that enabled remote, unauthenticated data exfiltration via a single crafted email. By chaining multiple bypasses-evading Microsofts XPIA (Cross Prompt Injection Attempt) classifier, circumventing link redaction with reference-style Markdown, exploiting auto-fetched images, and abusin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.10540","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2025-09-06T04:06:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"ef70a3192df5f319339150c4fe67a38c8adb64ca427a34afcf52632a79aed304","abstract_canon_sha256":"573960db090827e30e1a4933c849c65ed72825f98429535040167811c4871375"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.971390Z","signature_b64":"nOPamGWQU77hgiRiPIIGJ2erHojRXY/pAeV/WUrHkt1FSBrFshn/cJe+baqr63ywoHN4Hy71ima1HdPBceGkCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fa8f97f028be00f569384aa9d470dcdfec0c663423d8d93ff6866e443cdc0fef","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970805Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970805Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"EchoLeak: The First Real-World Zero-Click Prompt Injection Exploit in a Production LLM System","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Aditya Sanjay Gujral, Pavan Reddy","submitted_at":"2025-09-06T04:06:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language model (LLM) assistants are increasingly integrated into enterprise workflows, raising new security concerns as they bridge internal and external data sources. This paper presents an in-depth case study of EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711), a zero-click prompt injection vulnerability in Microsoft 365 Copilot that enabled remote, unauthenticated data exfiltration via a single crafted email. By chaining multiple bypasses-evading Microsofts XPIA (Cross Prompt Injection Attempt) classifier, circumventing link redaction with reference-style Markdown, exploiting auto-fetched images, and abusin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.10540","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.10540/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.10540","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.10540v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.10540","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7KHZP4BIXYAP","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JY","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7KHZP4BI","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27396","citing_title":"Agentic Literacy Debt: A Structural Problem the AI Literacy Field Has Not Yet Named","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18133","citing_title":"An Empirical Study of Privacy Leakage Chains via Prompt Injection in Black-Box Chatbot Environments","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11868","citing_title":"IPI-proxy: An Intercepting Proxy for Red-Teaming Web-Browsing AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03213","citing_title":"When Agents Handle Secrets: A Survey of Confidential Computing for Agentic AI","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03213","citing_title":"When Agents Handle Secrets: A Survey of Confidential Computing for Agentic AI","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7KHZP4BI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7KHZP4BI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.10540&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7KHZP4BIXYAPK2JYJKU5I4G437/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:11:22.970873+00:00"}