{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L","short_pith_number":"pith:7KMGEMZO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fa9862332e9ac81b11d7c04ce8c886d2d274c80798ca9352d931a651be37d693","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.15788","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On the performance of QTP functionals applied to second-order response properties II: Dynamic polarizability and long-range C$_6$ coefficients","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","authors_text":"Ajith Perera, Peter R. Franke, Rodney J. Bartlett, Rodrigo A. Mendes","submitted_at":"2026-03-16T18:13:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work is the second in the series \"On the performance of QTP functionals applied to second-order response properties.\" In the first paper (J. Chem. Phys. 162, 054105, 2025), we demonstrated the good performance of Quantum Theory Project functionals in predicting static perturbed second-order properties, such as static polarizabilities, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin-spin coupling constants, and NMR chemical shifts. In the present study, we focus on frequency-dependent properties, namely dynamic polarizabilities and C$_6$ dispersion coefficients. For completeness, a total of 25 excha"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.15788","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","submitted_at":"2026-03-16T18:13:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d6b4253aea66f11d668361ff58183ac20f4378eeb89e7239491cdbfcdd485845","abstract_canon_sha256":"427a480ba2389e9b4edbdec30091cbc6b81d58c4707fda2ca3fd9c32d07a9f50"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.445410Z","signature_b64":"G/qHmvlhYCyx6sz7A5gSYCLVwwxeXkZqDxtUEhVF2fWirm/QraQgxjN24rB9gUCo4TfbCmSKOSlr3kZkqvpeDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fa9862332e9ac81b11d7c04ce8c886d2d274c80798ca9352d931a651be37d693","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444847Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444847Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On the performance of QTP functionals applied to second-order response properties II: Dynamic polarizability and long-range C$_6$ coefficients","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","authors_text":"Ajith Perera, Peter R. Franke, Rodney J. Bartlett, Rodrigo A. Mendes","submitted_at":"2026-03-16T18:13:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"This work is the second in the series \"On the performance of QTP functionals applied to second-order response properties.\" In the first paper (J. Chem. Phys. 162, 054105, 2025), we demonstrated the good performance of Quantum Theory Project functionals in predicting static perturbed second-order properties, such as static polarizabilities, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin-spin coupling constants, and NMR chemical shifts. In the present study, we focus on frequency-dependent properties, namely dynamic polarizabilities and C$_6$ dispersion coefficients. For completeness, a total of 25 excha"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Among Kohn-Sham calculations, TPSS0 and QTP01 showed the best overall performance for dynamic polarizabilities. The best overall performance was obtained with O3LYP; however, the first eleven ranked functionals show very similar accuracy. Within the QTP family, QTP01 and LC-QTP provide the best results for C6 coefficients.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That EOM-CCSD provides a sufficiently accurate reference to rank functionals reliably, especially near excitation poles where the pole structure of CO was assessed and at the highest frequency where CC3 and EOM-CCSD differ.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients, with QTP01 and LC-QTP best within the QTP family and results close to EOM-CCSD.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"66e609ceaa1236c86df92b90d23f1c1f0ee34562a82cb524a7be7157908a992d"},"source":{"id":"2603.15788","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"1c3f71ae-ca42-4f9f-97b6-fafe0336480a","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T09:50:11.987969Z","strongest_claim":"Among Kohn-Sham calculations, TPSS0 and QTP01 showed the best overall performance for dynamic polarizabilities. The best overall performance was obtained with O3LYP; however, the first eleven ranked functionals show very similar accuracy. Within the QTP family, QTP01 and LC-QTP provide the best results for C6 coefficients.","one_line_summary":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients, with QTP01 and LC-QTP best within the QTP family and results close to EOM-CCSD.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That EOM-CCSD provides a sufficiently accurate reference to rank functionals reliably, especially near excitation poles where the pole structure of CO was assessed and at the highest frequency where CC3 and EOM-CCSD differ.","pith_extraction_headline":"TPSS0 and QTP01 rank highest among Kohn-Sham functionals for dynamic polarizabilities while O3LYP leads for C6 coefficients."},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"snapshot_sha256":"8fe15f200e37f0a01ab81eddc49067613c6377a8755bfef4be5e66ca4be45728"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.15788","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.15788v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.15788","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444917+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7KMGEMZOTLEB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7KMGEMZO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7KMGEMZO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7KMGEMZO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.15788&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7KMGEMZOTLEBWEOXYBGORSEG2L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444917+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:10:03.444917+00:00"}