{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB","short_pith_number":"pith:7N234CZX","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13388","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T11:46:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"37597c25dc8daedaea774255bd805ff84769a565cd73d83269c27ce7c8db0ad9","abstract_canon_sha256":"308b609a1afbb13369200abd7a5a46efd4cce4d6e5d52fd29d417188db4cf9b3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"fb75be0b37889bc04527a2e0892563107429e9683c56297f74312c15132c4ac8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.13388","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13388","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13388v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13388","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7N234CZXRCN4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7N234CZXRCN4ARJH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7N234CZX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.13388","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T11:46:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.AP"],"title_canon_sha256":"37597c25dc8daedaea774255bd805ff84769a565cd73d83269c27ce7c8db0ad9","abstract_canon_sha256":"308b609a1afbb13369200abd7a5a46efd4cce4d6e5d52fd29d417188db4cf9b3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"fb75be0b37889bc04527a2e0892563107429e9683c56297f74312c15132c4ac8","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47.741906Z","signature_b64":"7QIqA1n1nB5Izn0vQE4FlK3oq9/WXZGZwTaeKqEIhny6pWT8E179jqDv8G1HUlSD1FtwP6bhfNPUva1Z6Lp4Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fb75be0b37889bc04527a2e0892563107429e9683c56297f74312c15132c4ac8","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47.741461Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47.741461Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.13388","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"Pt4F6SWedzXBD7TeVTQ9wTLaCMlWspIYtW7ubJiLYdJAOnXmI+7BORSTyog3/1PRVeX0QyIxkA75eKJSub/fAA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-22T10:54:35.243204Z"},"content_sha256":"96304a8366ad6d1261a6b03a67b0015e76507e067604b42a1313ff20484b780c","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:96304a8366ad6d1261a6b03a67b0015e76507e067604b42a1313ff20484b780c"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Toward a practical handbook for choosing among causal inference methods in non-randomized studies with binary outcomes: A simulation study for applied researchers","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Simulations show the best causal method for binary outcomes depends on sample size, treatment share, and outcome prevalence","cross_cats":["stat.AP"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Adri\\'an Aurensanz-Crespo, Crist\\'obal M Rodr\\'iguez-Leal, Jes\\'us As\\'in, Jorge Castillo-Mateo, Jos\\'e M Ram\\'irez, Rosario Susi, Teresa P\\'erez","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T11:46:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"Applied researchers in biomedicine and related fields are often interested in estimating the causal effect of a treatment or intervention. Although randomized clinical trials are considered the gold standard for establishing causal effects, they are not always feasible, and real-world data may represent the only available source of evidence. In such settings, causal effects must be estimated using statistical methods applied to observational data. Over the last few decades, modern causal inference methods based on the potential outcomes framework have emerged as useful tools in this field. How"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The performance of propensity score full matching, inverse probability weighting, G-computation, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation depends on sample size, proportion treated, outcome prevalence, treatment effect magnitude, target estimand, and assumption violations; the resulting handbook provides practical guidance for method selection in binary-outcome settings.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the chosen simulation scenarios and performance metrics adequately cover the range of real-world data characteristics and that the four methods were implemented without simulation-specific biases that would not appear in actual data analysis.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"A simulation study compares four causal methods for binary treatment and outcome and delivers a selection handbook tested on two real medical datasets.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Simulations show the best causal method for binary outcomes depends on sample size, treatment share, and outcome prevalence","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"b51f04128726492719cd3412ecb16dad6f5b32c003781aa1904aadf25b5ea1ec"},"source":{"id":"2605.13388","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"d4238091-bfe8-4b6c-9dc5-7ba06ee03dc4","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T18:03:15.607695Z","strongest_claim":"The performance of propensity score full matching, inverse probability weighting, G-computation, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation depends on sample size, proportion treated, outcome prevalence, treatment effect magnitude, target estimand, and assumption violations; the resulting handbook provides practical guidance for method selection in binary-outcome settings.","one_line_summary":"A simulation study compares four causal methods for binary treatment and outcome and delivers a selection handbook tested on two real medical datasets.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the chosen simulation scenarios and performance metrics adequately cover the range of real-world data characteristics and that the four methods were implemented without simulation-specific biases that would not appear in actual data analysis.","pith_extraction_headline":"Simulations show the best causal method for binary outcomes depends on sample size, treatment share, and outcome prevalence"},"references":{"count":41,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Per-Protocol Analyses of Pragmatic Trials.New England Journal of Medicine.2017;377:1391–1398","work_id":"cb416467-b62b-4a84-90d8-9ad6b1a4e631","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"What if.Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020","work_id":"c800230e-b913-4e67-b3e7-46597ae2e7fc","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1986,"title":"Identifiability, Exchangeability, and Epidemiological Confounding.Inter- national Journal of Epidemiology.1986;15:413–419","work_id":"309f7618-c464-4c44-904a-88a7b71910d4","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2010,"title":"Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.Statistical Science: a Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.2010;25(1):1","work_id":"b0a7c076-d8fe-45e6-8dc8-e89790e56315","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Introduction to Computational Causal Inference Using Reproducible Stata, R, and Python Code: A Tutorial.Statistics in Medicine.2022;41:407–432","work_id":"1786e7c6-2b7e-43bb-a1d8-a0f388dba23d","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":41,"snapshot_sha256":"952146574fa09a29a6ea9100fd7b80c7011c49a0b3832a75c8a1469b9e245335","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"d4238091-bfe8-4b6c-9dc5-7ba06ee03dc4"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"g1zsHLP3S+R51DRLgB5Atn5uXTtk9WMSLgRlD7yw3Mg7Q8QpX2z83zyGYKddWqfXdpx7a3K6JsrUNSTcsSL0AQ==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-22T10:54:35.244264Z"},"content_sha256":"250bd7f5138c9565d3ba027743b3b4aba54ae4d326562acbd9284c01490db0ce","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:250bd7f5138c9565d3ba027743b3b4aba54ae4d326562acbd9284c01490db0ce"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-22T10:54:35Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:7N234CZXRCN4ARJHULQISJLDCB","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"308b609a1afbb13369200abd7a5a46efd4cce4d6e5d52fd29d417188db4cf9b3","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.AP"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T11:46:47Z","title_canon_sha256":"37597c25dc8daedaea774255bd805ff84769a565cd73d83269c27ce7c8db0ad9"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13388","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.13388","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.13388v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.13388","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7N234CZXRCN4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7N234CZXRCN4ARJH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7N234CZX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:250bd7f5138c9565d3ba027743b3b4aba54ae4d326562acbd9284c01490db0ce","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The performance of propensity score full matching, inverse probability weighting, G-computation, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation depends on sample size, proportion treated, outcome prevalence, treatment effect magnitude, target estimand, and assumption violations; the resulting handbook provides practical guidance for method selection in binary-outcome settings."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the chosen simulation scenarios and performance metrics adequately cover the range of real-world data characteristics and that the four methods were implemented without simulation-specific biases that would not appear in actual data analysis."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"A simulation study compares four causal methods for binary treatment and outcome and delivers a selection handbook tested on two real medical datasets."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Simulations show the best causal method for binary outcomes depends on sample size, treatment share, and outcome prevalence"}],"snapshot_sha256":"b51f04128726492719cd3412ecb16dad6f5b32c003781aa1904aadf25b5ea1ec"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Applied researchers in biomedicine and related fields are often interested in estimating the causal effect of a treatment or intervention. Although randomized clinical trials are considered the gold standard for establishing causal effects, they are not always feasible, and real-world data may represent the only available source of evidence. In such settings, causal effects must be estimated using statistical methods applied to observational data. Over the last few decades, modern causal inference methods based on the potential outcomes framework have emerged as useful tools in this field. How","authors_text":"Adri\\'an Aurensanz-Crespo, Crist\\'obal M Rodr\\'iguez-Leal, Jes\\'us As\\'in, Jorge Castillo-Mateo, Jos\\'e M Ram\\'irez, Rosario Susi, Teresa P\\'erez","cross_cats":["stat.AP"],"headline":"Simulations show the best causal method for binary outcomes depends on sample size, treatment share, and outcome prevalence","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T11:46:47Z","title":"Toward a practical handbook for choosing among causal inference methods in non-randomized studies with binary outcomes: A simulation study for applied researchers"},"references":{"count":41,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":41,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Per-Protocol Analyses of Pragmatic Trials.New England Journal of Medicine.2017;377:1391–1398","work_id":"cb416467-b62b-4a84-90d8-9ad6b1a4e631","year":2017},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"What if.Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020","work_id":"c800230e-b913-4e67-b3e7-46597ae2e7fc","year":2020},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Identifiability, Exchangeability, and Epidemiological Confounding.Inter- national Journal of Epidemiology.1986;15:413–419","work_id":"309f7618-c464-4c44-904a-88a7b71910d4","year":1986},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.Statistical Science: a Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.2010;25(1):1","work_id":"b0a7c076-d8fe-45e6-8dc8-e89790e56315","year":2010},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"Introduction to Computational Causal Inference Using Reproducible Stata, R, and Python Code: A Tutorial.Statistics in Medicine.2022;41:407–432","work_id":"1786e7c6-2b7e-43bb-a1d8-a0f388dba23d","year":2022}],"snapshot_sha256":"952146574fa09a29a6ea9100fd7b80c7011c49a0b3832a75c8a1469b9e245335"},"source":{"id":"2605.13388","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-14T18:03:15.607695Z","id":"d4238091-bfe8-4b6c-9dc5-7ba06ee03dc4","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"A simulation study compares four causal methods for binary treatment and outcome and delivers a selection handbook tested on two real medical datasets.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Simulations show the best causal method for binary outcomes depends on sample size, treatment share, and outcome prevalence","strongest_claim":"The performance of propensity score full matching, inverse probability weighting, G-computation, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation depends on sample size, proportion treated, outcome prevalence, treatment effect magnitude, target estimand, and assumption violations; the resulting handbook provides practical guidance for method selection in binary-outcome settings.","weakest_assumption":"That the chosen simulation scenarios and performance metrics adequately cover the range of real-world data characteristics and that the four methods were implemented without simulation-specific biases that would not appear in actual data analysis."}},"verdict_id":"d4238091-bfe8-4b6c-9dc5-7ba06ee03dc4"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:96304a8366ad6d1261a6b03a67b0015e76507e067604b42a1313ff20484b780c","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"308b609a1afbb13369200abd7a5a46efd4cce4d6e5d52fd29d417188db4cf9b3","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.AP"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T11:46:47Z","title_canon_sha256":"37597c25dc8daedaea774255bd805ff84769a565cd73d83269c27ce7c8db0ad9"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.13388","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"fb75be0b37889bc04527a2e0892563107429e9683c56297f74312c15132c4ac8","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"fb75be0b37889bc04527a2e0892563107429e9683c56297f74312c15132c4ac8","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47.741461Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47.741461Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"7QIqA1n1nB5Izn0vQE4FlK3oq9/WXZGZwTaeKqEIhny6pWT8E179jqDv8G1HUlSD1FtwP6bhfNPUva1Z6Lp4Ag==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:47.741906Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.13388","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:96304a8366ad6d1261a6b03a67b0015e76507e067604b42a1313ff20484b780c","sha256:250bd7f5138c9565d3ba027743b3b4aba54ae4d326562acbd9284c01490db0ce"],"state_sha256":"1441c3936c41c0613849348e2799e7e30271a2bb90c6200a334dd5b5ba699b42"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"ZY6TalCPy9j7CxX7fkOoSZp2TV5X8f5hIwPXh1oGDt5gqIe8FH2rD/D5/BahTyhhRln18biMxf1AjBRQ7fbkAA==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-22T10:54:35.247310Z","bundle_sha256":"8c138fe0f58bc52bbbd3c0575e10678b96cb8cd89f55e51575265884882f277c"}}